STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
The Regional Manager State Bank of India & Anr. – Appellant
Versus
Sri Srikanta Ojha – Respondent
SC/19/A/845/2018
##PAGE1##
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
WEST BENGAL
FIRST APPEAL NO. SC/19/A/845/2018
The Regional Manager, State Bank of India & Anr. .......Appellant(s)
PRESENT ADDRESS - P.O. & P.S. - Gosaba, Dist. South 24 Pgs., Pin -743 3
The Br. Manager, State Bank of India
PRESENT ADDRESS - P.O. & P.S. - Gosaba, Dist. South 24 Pgs., Pin -743 3
Versus
Sri Srikanta Ojha .......Respondent(s)
PRESENT ADDRESS - S/o Lt. Ananta Ojha, Vill., P.O. & P.S. - Gosaba, Dist.
BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. AJEYA MATILAL , JUDICIAL MEMBER
HON'BLE MRS. SAMIKSHA BHATTACHARYA , MEMBER
Ms. Deblina Lahiri. (Advocate)
FOR THE APPELLANT:
Mr. Ratan Ghosh. (Advocate)
FOR THE RESPONDENT:
DATED: 30/01/2026
ORDER
Samiksha Bhattacharya, Member
The instant Appeal has been directed by the Appellant/The Regional Manager,
State Bank of India and another challenging the Order dated 04.09.2018 in
Complaint Case No. CC/52/2018 passed by Ld. DCDRC, South 24 Parganas.
The facts of the case, in brief, are that the Respondent/Complainant
‘ ’
(hereinafter referred to as Complainant) being a marginal and small farmer
took an agricultural loan amounting to Rs.10,000/- in the year 2001 from the
##PAGE2##‘
SBI, Gosaba Branch/Appellant No.2/OP No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as OP
’
No.2) and a loan Account being no. 01579082515 has been opened by the
Bank in the name of the Complainant with a Kisan Credit Card sum pass book.
Thereafter, Complainant deposited Rs.10,000/- on 21.01.2008 in the said
account to disburse the loan partly. In the year 2008 the Central Government
has pleased to declare a scheme namely Agricultural Debt Waiver and Debt
Relief Scheme, 2008 whereby the loan advanced to marginal and small farmers
upto limit of Rs.1,00,000/- was waived. Accordingly, OP no. 2 prepared a list
of exempted borrowers and displayed the same on the notice board of OP No. 2
where the name of the Complainant was included. Therefore, the Complainant
demanded return of Rs.10,000/- paid by the Complainant to liquidate the
amount in compliance with the Central Government Scheme. So, he filed an
application under RTI before the OP No. 2 to furnish the information whether his
name was included in the list of exempted borrowers but no reply has been
sent by the OP No. 2. Hence, the Complainant has filed the petition of
complaint before the Ld. DCDRC concerned praying for direction upon the
‘ ’
Appellant No. 1/OP No. 1(hereinafter referred to as OP No.1) and OP No. 2 to
produce the list prepared under the Agricultural Debt Waiver and Debt Relief
Scheme, 2008 and to return of Rs.10,000/- with 10% interest per diem along
with compensation of Rs.50,000/- and litigation cost of Rs.25,000/-.
Both the OPs appeared and filed their written version before the Ld. Trial
Commission. In their written version OPs admitted that on 13.08.2001 the loan
of Rs.10,000/- was disbursed in favour of the Complainant and on
20.01.2008 Complainant deposited a sum of Rs.10,000/-. O.Ps have denied
other material allegations inter alia stated that complainant is not entitled to
get the benefit of Agricultural Debt Waiver and Debt Relief Scheme, 2008. After
a lapse of seven years the complainant repaid his loan and after a lapse of 10
years complainant made a letter for the waiver scheme. Therefore, the case is
barred by limitation. After a gap of almost one decade the Complainant has
approached the OPs. Therefore, there is no deficiency in service on their part.
Hence, the OPs have prayed for dismissal of the complaint in limini.
The Ld. DCDRC allowed the complaint. The order of the Ld. DCDRC is reproduced
as under:
“
That the complaint case be and the same is decreed on contest against the OPs
with a cost of Rs.10,000/- to be paid by the OPs to the complainant.
The OPs are directed jointly and severally to return Rs. 10,000/- to the
complainant with interest @ 10% p.a. from the date of his deposit i.e.
21.01.2008 till full realization thereof.
They are also directed to pay a sum of Rs.1 lac jointly and severally for unfair
trade practice adopted by them and out of that amount, Rs.30,0
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.