SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 666

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
DR .RUCHI & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
MS. PUSHPA – Respondent


IN THE DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION Date of Institution: 12.12.2024 Date of Hearing: 09.01.2026 Date of Decision: 02.02.2026 FIRST APPEAL NO.- 803/2024 IN THE MATTER OF

1. DR. RUCHI, DOCTOR OF SKINN ‘O’ HAIR, AESTHETIC CLINIC & ACADEMY.

2. SKINN ‘O’ HAIR AESTHETIC CLINIC & ACADEMY, THROUGH ITS PARTNER, BOTH HAVING ITS OFFICE AT:-

F-22, BASEMENT GEETANJALI ENCLAVE, NEAR AUROBINDO COLLEGE, MALVIYA NAGAR, NEW DELHI-110017.

(Through: Ms. Srishti Sharma & Associates)

Appellants VERSUS MRS. PUSHPA, W/O SH. SURENDER SINGH, R/O H.NO. 102/29, STREET NO. 1, LAXMAN VIHAR, PHASE – 2, GURUGRAM, HARYANA.

(Through: Mr. S. S. Panwar & Associates)

…Respondent CORAM:

HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL (PRESIDENT)

HON’BLE MS. BIMLA KUMARI, MEMBER (FEMALE)

Present: Appellant in Person.

Mr. Shashwat Rajpurohit, Counsel for the Respondent.

PER: HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, PRESIDENT JUDGMENT

1. The Appellant has preferred the present Appeal under Section 41 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 to set aside the impugned order dated 06.11.2024 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-II, South Delhi in Complaint Case no. 125/2024 filed by Respondent/Complainan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top