SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 34513

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
CHAIRMEN FULCHANDJI SHRIRANGJI PALLOD – Appellant
Versus
SANDIPAN APPARNO SHITOLE – Respondent
SC/CB1/27/RP/53/2024



Petitioner Advocates:ANIL K. JAWALKAR ,Respondent Advocate:

Date of filing :07.08.2024 Date of order :16.01.2025 MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION,MUMBAI, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

REVISION PETITION NO. : 53 OF 2024 IN COMPLAINT CASE NO.: 99 OF 2024 DISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSION : LATUR

1. Chairman, …REVISION PETITIONER Fulchandji Shrirangji Pallod, ( Adv.A.K.Jawalkar)

Maheshwari Bahuuddeshiya Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Ltd, Latur, Opp. Shivnery Gate, Kava Road, Market Yard, Latur.

2. Secretary, Premkishor Mathurda Mundada, Maheshwari Bahuuddeshiya Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Ltd, Latur, Opp. Shivnery Gate, Kava Road, Market Yard, Latur.

3. Director, Purushottam Govindlal Bhandari, Maheshwari Bahuuddeshiya Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Ltd, Latur, Opp. Shivnery Gate, Kava Road, Market Yard, Latur.

4. Director, Vijayshree Dilipji Mundada, Maheshwari Bahuuddeshiya Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Ltd, Latur, Opp. Shivnery Gate, Kava Road, Market Yard, Latur.

VERSUS

1. Sandip Apparao Shitole, …RESPONDENT R/o Tulsidham, Phase No.3, ( Adv.S.M.Yerate)

Hake Nagar, Latur.

2. Vice Chairman, ( Person)

Nandkishor Dwarkadasji Soni, Maheshwari Bahuuddeshiya Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Ltd, Latur, Opp. Shivnery Gate, Kava Road, Market Yard, Latur.

3. Manager, (Exparte)

Bhimashankar Nilkanthrao Patil, Maheshwari Bahuuddeshiya Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Ltd, Latur, Opp. Shivnery Gate, Kava Road, Market Yard, Latur.

4. Director, (Exparte)

Suresh Damodharji Malu, Maheshwari Bahuuddeshiya Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Ltd, Latur, Opp. Shivnery Gate, Kava Road, Market Yard, Latur.

5. Director, (Exparte)

Santosh Jugalkishor Gilda, Maheshwari Bahuuddeshiya Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Ltd, Latur, Opp. Shivnery Gate, Kava Road, Market Yard, Latur.

6. Director, (Exparte)

Sou.Meenadevi Hanumandasji Bangad, Maheshwari Bahuuddeshiya Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Ltd, Latur, Opp. Shivnery Gate, Kava Road, Market Yard, Latur.

7. Director, (Exparte)

Shivaji Vaijnathrao Gavli, Maheshwari Bahuuddeshiya Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Ltd, Latur, Opp. Shivnery Gate, Kava Road, Market Yard, Latur.

8. Director, (Exparte)

Santosh Trimbakdas Pethe, Maheshwari Bahuuddeshiya Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Ltd, Latur, Opp. Shivnery Gate, Kava Road, Market Yard, Latur.

CORAM : Milind.S.Sonawane, Hon’ble Presiding Member.

Dr.Nisha.A.Chavhan, Hon’ble Member, Nagesh.C.Kumbre, Hon’ble Member J U D G M E N T Per Nagesh.C.Kumbre, Hon’ble Member.

This is the revision petition filed under S.47 (1) (b) of the Consumer Protection Act 2019 ( in short the C.P. Act ) challenging the ex-parte order passed against the revision petitioners in consumer complaint C.C.No.98/2024 by the District Consumer Commission Latur ( in short the District Commission ).

2. The facts relevant to this revision petition are that, respondent no.1 filed the consumer complaint 98/2024 against the revision petitioners and remaining respondents before the District Commission alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on their part. The complaint gets admitted on 15.04.2024 and notices were issued to revision petitioners and respondent no. 2 to 8. As the envelope containing notices were return to District Commission with postal remark “Refused” therefore the District Commission on 31.05.2024 passed the “ex- parte” order against the revision petitioners and respondent no. 2 to 8. Being aggrieved thereby the revision petitioners are before us in this revision petition.

3. The notices of this revision petition were issued to respondents and after service of notice, respondent no. 1 appeared through Adv.Yerte and respondent no.2 Nandkishor Soni, appeared in person before this commission. Respondent no. 3,4,5,6,7, and 8 are duly served but remained absent till today. Hence, as per order dated 01.01.2025 this revision petition proceeded ex-parte against respondent no. 3 to 8.

4. Heard Adv. Jawalkar for revision petitioner, Adv. Yerte for respondent no.1 and Nandkishor Soni, respondent no.2 in person. We have gone through entire record of the case.

5. Adv. Jawalkar submitted that respondent no.1 sen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top