STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
1.The Station Superintendent South Central Railways – Appellant
Versus
Tarannum Sultana – Respondent
BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.
F.A.No. 369 OF 2020 AGAINST ORDERS IN C.C.284/2018 DISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSION, ADILABAD Between:
1. The Station Superintendent, South Central Railways, Railway Station, Adilabad.
2. The Division Manager, South Central Railways, Nanded (Maharashtra)
……..Appellants/ Opposite Parties And:
Tarannum Sultana, W/o Abdul Aleem, Aged 26 years, Occ.: Housewife, R/o Kranthinagar, Adilabad.
……..Respondent/Complainant Counsel for the Appellants/Opposite Parties : M/s. Vijaya Sagi Counsel for the Respondent/Complainant : M/s. S. Roja Ramani QUORUM :
HON’BLE SMT. MEENA RAMANATHAN, I/c PRESIDENT &
HON’BLE SRI. V.V.SESHUBABU, MEMBER – (JUDICIAL)
WEDNESDAY, THE 12th DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND TWENTY FIVE **********
Order : (PER HON’BLE SMT. MEENA RAMANATHAN, I/c PRESIDENT) 1. The appeal is filed U/s 15 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by the Opposite Parties No.1 & 2, aggrieved by the order of District Consumer Commission, Adilabad, dated 06.02.2020 in CC
284/2018.
2. The brief averments of the complaint are that on 15.05.2018, the complainant purchased Journey tickets, bearing No. UPC 12463055 at Kinwat to go to Adilabad in Parl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.