SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 35341

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
TEUZING THARDOE – Appellant
Versus
RELIANCE GEN. INSURANCE CO. – Respondent


IN THE DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION Date of Institution: 24.06.2013 Date of hearing: 15.01.2025 Date of Decision: 25.02.2025 COMPLAINT CASE NO.- 374/2013 IN THE MATTER OF MR. TENZING THARDOE, R/O 47, NEW DELHI CAMP, NEW ARJUN NAGAR, DELHI – 110054.

(Through: Mr. Vidit Gupta, Advocate)

…Complainant VERSUS RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., C-1, 3RD FLOOR, KRISHNA PARK, NEAR JANAK PURI, WEST METRO STATION, NEW DELHI – 18.

(Through: Mr. Navneet Kumar, Advocate)

…Opposite Party CORAM:

HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL (PRESIDENT)

HON’BLE MS. BIMLA KUMARI, MEMBER (FEMALE)

Present: None for the Complainant Mr. Navneet Kumar, counsel for OP appeared on VC.

Mr. Sharan, counsel for the Opposite Party.

PER: HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL (PRESIDENT)

JUDGMENT

1. The present Complaint has been filed before this Commission under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, by the Complainant alleging deficiency in service and Unfair Trade Practice on the part of Opposite Party and has prayed for the following reliefs:

“i. May kindly be please to direct the respondent to compensate the complainant for his damages and sufferings as mentioned in para no-14:

Para -14 Th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top