SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 35979

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
M. Premnath – Appellant
Versus
M/s. CITI Bank – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:BFS Legal ,Respondent Advocate:

Date of filing : 01.12.2016.

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI.

Present: Hon’ble Thiru Justice R.SUBBIAH, PRESIDENT C.C. No.3 of 2017 Friday, the 28th day of March, 2025 Mr.M.Premnath, S/o K.Mahalingam, No.47/22, Paripoorna Vinayakar Koil Street, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. … Complainant Vs.

M/s CITI Bank, Represented by its Authorized Signatory, No.2, Club House Road, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002. ... Opposite Party.

For Complainant : M/s. BFS Legal For Opposite Party : M/s. King Stubb & Kaisaiva This Complaint came up for final hearing on

26.03.2025 and, after hearing the arguments of the counsel for the complainant and the opposite party and on perusing the materials on record, this Commission passes the following:-

O R D E R

R.SUBBIAH, J-PRESIDENT This complaint has been filed under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, as against the Opposite Party for the following reliefs:

i) To direct the opposite party to pay a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- towards loss of rental income to be availed out of the flat to the complainant;

ii) to pay a sum of Rs.8,00,000/- towards monetary loss, hardship, mental agony, trauma, stress physical strain, pain, pre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top