SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 37311

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Mrs. Sayeeda Abood Mahfooz – Appellant
Versus
Gullapalli Gopi Krishna – Respondent
SC/36/A/264/2023



Petitioner Advocates:M/s Wasim Ahmed Khan ,Respondent Advocate:

BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.

FA.NO.264 OF 2023 AGAINST ORDERS IN CC.NO.473 OF 2021, DISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSION-II, HYDERABAD Between:

1. Mrs.Sayeeda Abood Mahfooz, W/o.Late Abood Ahmed Bin Mahfooz, Aged about 60 years, Occ: Household.

2. Mr.Saleh Abood Mahfooz, S/o.Late Abood Ahmed Bin Mahfooz, Aged about 40 years, Occ: Business.

3. Mr.Mohammed Abood Mahfooz, S/o. Late Abood Ahmed Bin Mahfooz, Aged about 39 years, Occ: Business.

4. Mrs.Muna Abood Mahfooz, D/o. Late Abood Ahmed Bin Mahfooz, Aged about 40 years, Occ: Household.

5. Mrs. Saleha Abood Mahfooz, D/o. Late Abood Ahmed Bin Mahfooz, Aged about 37 years, Occ: Housewife.

6. Mr.Faisal Abood Mahfooz, S/o. Late Abood Ahmed Bin Mahfooz, Aged about 35 years, Occ: Business.

7. Mr.Saud Abood Mahfooz, S/o. Late Abood Ahmed Bin Mahfooz, Aged about 33 years, Occ: Business.

8. Ms.Aisha Abood Mahfooz, D/o. Late Abood Ahmed Bin Mahfooz, Aged about 29 years, Occ: Household.

9. Ms.Al-Anood Abood Mahfooz, D/o. Late Abood Ahmed Bin Mahfooz, Aged about 27 years, Occ: Household.

Correct address:-

(1 to 9 are R/o.H.No.8-2-323/32, Rock Cliff, Road No.3, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad – 500034)

Address shown in the order wrongly as follows:

H.No.6-3-564, Somajiguda, Hyderabad.

..…Appellants/Opp.Parties 1 to 9 And

1. Gullapalli Gopi Krishna, S/o.Gullapalli Sri Krishna, Aged about 44 years, Occ: Business, R/o.Villa No.193, Indu Fortune Fields, Phase-I, KPHB Colony, Kukatpally, Hyderabad.

…..Respondent No.1/Complainant

2. Mr.Iftikar Ali Abbasi, S/o.Late Mahamid Ali Abbasi, Aged about 75 years, Occ: Business, 3. Mr.Irtiza Ali Abbasi, S/o.Late Mahamid Ali Abbasi, Aged about 73 years, Occ: Business, 4. Mr.Hamid Ali Abbasi, S/o.Late Mahamid Ali Abbasi, Aged about 68 years, Occ: Business, 5. Mr.Shahid Ali Abbasi, S/o.Late Mahamid Ali Abbasi, Aged about 66 years, Occ: Business, 6. Mr.Sareer Ara Band Abbasi, D/o.Late Mahamid Ali Abbasi, Aged about 64 years, Occ: Business, 7. Mr.Hashim Ali Abbasi, S/o.Late Mahamid Ali Abbasi, Aged about 60 years, Occ: Business, 8. Mr.Khursheed Ara Abbasi, S/o.Late Mahamid Ali Abbasi, Aged about 58 years, Occ: Business, 9. Mr.Sajid Ali Abbasi, S/o.Late Mahamid Ali Abbasi, Aged about 61 years, Occ: Pensioner.

(2 to 9 are R/o.H.No.6-3-564, Somajiguda, Hyderabad).

…..Respondents No.2 to 9/

Opp.Parties No.10 to 17 Counsel for the Appellants/OPs 1 to 9: M/s.Washim Ahmed Khan Counsel for the Respondent 1/Complainant : M/s.V.Gourisankara Rao Counsel for the Respondents 2 to 9/OPs 10 to 17: M/s.P.C.Yadav-R2 to R4 & R6 to R9 Notice served – R5 QUORAM:

HON’BLE SMT.MEENA RAMANATHAN…IN-CHARGE PRESIDENT &

HON’BLE SRI V.V.SESHUBABU, MEMBER-JUDICIAL WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND TWENTY FIVE *******

Order : (Per Smt.Meena Ramanathan, Hon’ble In-charge President)

1. This appeal is filed by the Appellants/Opp.Parties No.1 to 9 under Section 41 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019, praying this Commission to set aside the judgment and order dated 27.01.2023 in CC.No.473/2021 on the file of the District Consumer Forum-II, Hyderabad and to pass such other order or orders which this Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are described as arrayed in the complaint. The Appellants are the Opposite Parties No.1 to 9, Respondent No.1 is the Complainant and the Respondents No.2 to 9 are the Opposite Parties No.10 to 17 in CC.No.473/2021.

3. Briefly stated, the facts are that – the complaint is filed against the Opposite Parties No.1 to 9 for their deficiency in service, and unfair trade practice and sought a relief against Opposite Parties No.10 to 17 to register the Sale Deed in favour of the Complainant along with compensation and other reliefs.

4. The Complainant is the wife of late Mr.K.Venkat Reddy, the owner and possessor of Flat No.304, 3rd floor, Abbasi Towers, Erramanzil, Somajiguda, Hyderabad. The Opposite Parties No.1 to 9 are the legal heirs and representatives of the original builder/D

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top