STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION KARNATAKA FIRST APPEAL NO. SC/29/A/793/2015 M/s. Mandovi Motors Pvt Limited PRESENT ADDRESS - a Company Incorporated under the companies Act1956, 40/4, Lavelle Road, Bengaluru-560001.Rep by its vice president(Sales & Marketing) Mr. K. Yeshwant Raj, ,KARNATAKA.

M/s. Mandovi Motors Pvt Limited. A company Incorporated, Under the companies Act,1956 PRESENT ADDRESS - Bengaluru-Chennai road, National Highway 75, Kondarajanahalli Village, Kolar TQ and District, Rep by its General Manager (Sales & Marketing) Mr. H. Nagaraj. ,KARNATAKA.

.......Appellant(s)

Versus Mr. G. Sunder Raj, S/o. Mr. Ganehan, Aged about 57 years, PRESENT ADDRESS - R/at No. 4363, Nalanda Vihar, 3rd main, 4th cross, Amravathi Nagar, Bangarpet, Kolar District. ,KARNATAKA.

.......Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

HON'BLE MR. RAVISHANKAR , JUDICIAL MEMBER HON'BLE MRS. SMT.SUNITA CHANNABASAPPA BAGEWADI , MEMBER FOR THE APPELLANT:

NEMO DATED: 11/08/2025

ORDER

THE KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BANGALORE. (ADDL. BENCH)

th

DATED THIS THE 11 DAY OF AUGUST, 2025

APPEAL NO.793/2015

PRESENT

SRI RAVI SHANKAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER SMT. SUNITA C.BAGEWADI, MEMBER

1. M/s.Mandovi Motors Pvt., Ltd., A Company incorporated Under the Companies Act, 1956, 40/4, Lavelle Road, BENGALURU – 560001, Represented by its Vice-President (Sales and Marketing)

Mr.K.Yeshwant Rai.

2. M/s.Mandovi Motors Pvt., Ltd., A Company incorporated Under the Companies Act, 1956, Bengaluru –Chennai Road, National Highway 75, Kondarajanahalli Village, Kolar Taluk and District, Represented by its General Manager (Sales & Marketing)

Mr.H.Nagaraj. … Appellant/s (By M/s.Murthy and Kumar, Advocates)

V/s Mr.G.Sounder Raj, Son of Mr.Ganeshan, Aged about 57 years, Residing at No.4363, Nalanda Vihar, 3^rd Main, 4^th Cross, Amravathi Nagar, Bangarpet, Kolar District.

… Respondent/s (By, Mr.B.S.Sathyanarayana, Advocate)

O R D E R

BY SMT. SUNITA C.BAGEWADI, MEMBER This appeal is filed by the Appellants/Opposite Parties being aggrieved by the order dated

04.08.2015 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kolar in CC.No.11/2015 and prays to set-aside the order passed by the District Commission and dismiss the complaint, in the interest of justice and equity.

2. The facts of the case;

On 17.06.2014 the complainant had booked new ERTIGA VDI BSIV – R3RDCL Silky Silver Colour vehicle (Car) with Opposite Party No.1 and Opposite Party quoted the road cost of the vehicle of Rs.8,24,895/-. On 17.06.2014 the complainant had paid Rs.5,000/- towards advance booking and later he had paid Rs.50,000/- on 13.08.2014, Rs.7,76,595/- on 23.09.2014 and Rs.500/- on 15.10.2014 totally Opposite Party No.1 had received Rs.8,32,095/-. The complainant had obtained a delivery of the said vehicle on 15.10.2014. The Opposite Party No.1 had received the excess amount of Rs.7,200/- than that of the actual cost of the vehicle on road. Hence, complainant claimed for refund of the excess sum of Rs.7,200/-. Opposite Party No.1 issued a statement of Account dated 21.10.2014 adjusting the same by giving explanation that Rs.450/- came to be collected towards Temporary Registration and Rs.6,750/- towards handling Charges. Hence, the complaint.

3. After service of notice of the District Commission, the Opposite Parties No.1 & 2 appeared through their counsel and filed version and admitted that the complainant had paid sum of Rs.8,32,095/- towards purchase of the vehicle and they had issued the order booking form cum sales contract in which details regarding cost of the vehicle, insurance, handling charges etc., have been mentioned and prays for the dismissal of the complaint.

4. After trial the District Commission allowed the complaint.

5. Aggrieved by the said order the Appellant/ Opposite Parties preferred this Appeal.

6. Heard from Appellant side. Inspite of sufficient opportunities has been granted, respondent not present and not argued the matter.

7. Perused the memorandum of appeal and certified copy of the ord