SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 37916

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MADHYA RAILWAYS – Appellant
Versus
VINAY JAIN – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:SH.H.S.RAJPUT ,Respondent Advocate:

M.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION PLOT NO. 76, ARERA HILLS, BHOPAL (M.P.)

APPEAL NO. 698/2020

1. General Manager Central Rail Divisional Office Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminal Mumbai (Maharashtra) 2. General Manager Western Central Railway Divisional Office Jabalpur (M.P.)

3. Station Terminal Indian Railway Railway Station Damoh (M.P.) ... Appellants VERSUS.

Vijay Jain, Advocate S/o Late Lalchand Jain Age 64 years R/o Naya Bazar No.2, Damoh District Damoh (M.P.) ... Respondent BEFORE;

HON’BLE JUSTICE SUNITA YADAV, PRESIDENT HON’BLE DR. SRIKANT PANDEY, MEMBER COUNSEL FOR THE PARTIES:

SHIR DEEPESH SHUKLA, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR APPELLANTS.

NONE FOR RESPONDENT.

O R D E R

( 14.08.2025 )

Per say - Justice Sunita Yadav, President.

This appeal by the appellant/opposite parties- Railways, assails the order dated 3.7.2020, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Damoh (for short ‘District Commission’), in complaint case No. 65/2019, whereby the District Commission has partly allowed the complaint filed respondent/complainant (hereinafter referred to as ‘complainant’).

2. Briefly put, the facts of the case are that on 4.9.2018, the complainant, along with his wife, was t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top