SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 718

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
SUSHMA BANSAL – Appellant
Versus
GMADA – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:ARUNA SACHDEVA ,Respondent Advocate:

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, CHANDIGARH.

Consumer Complaint No.43 of 2024 Date of institution : 13.08.2024 Date of Reserve : 16.01.2026 Date of decision : 03.02.2026 Sushma Bansal aged about 44 years, wife of Sh. Mudit Bansal R/o H.No.69, Bazaar No.5, Ferozepur Cantt., Punjab, now residing at A-201, Gala Aura Gymkhana Road South Bopal, Ahmedabad, Gujarat having Adhaar No.7437 3699 6857, phone No.9888840586.

….Complainant Versus Chief Administrator, Greater Mohali Area Development Authority, PUDA Bhawan, Phase-8, SAS Nagar.

.…Opposite Party Consumer Complaint under Section 47 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Quorum:-

Mrs. Kiran Sibal, Presiding Member Ms. Simarjot Kaur, Member Argued By:

For the complainant : Ms. Aruna Sachdeva, Advocate For opposite parties : Ms. Aditi Sharma, Advocate KIRAN SIBAL, PRESIDING MEMBER:

The complainant has filed this complaint, under Section 47 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (in short, “the Act”), against the opposite party, seeking following directions: (i) To refund an amount of Rs.54,84,000/- of interest and penal interest w.e.f. 10.09.2013 to 31.12.2018 charged by the OP arbitrarily;

(ii) To pay Rs.1,00,000/- for compens

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top