SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 807

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
UMMEED HOUSING FINANCE PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
MR. NITIN – Respondent


IN THE DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTESREDRESSAL COMMISSION Date of Institution: 27.01.2026 Date of Hearing: 06.02.2026 Date of Decision: 06.02.2026 REVISION PETITION NO.7/2026 IN THE MATTER OF UMMEED HOUSING FINANCE PVT. LTD.

UNIT NO.809-815, 8TH FLOOR, EMAAR DIGITAL GREENS, TOWER-A, GOLF COURSE EXT. ROAD, SECTOR-16, GURUGRAM, HARYANA -122102.

ALSO AT:

UNIT NO.302-303, PLOT NO.06, 3RD FLOOR, ADITYA TOWER, LAXMI NAGAR, DISTRICT CENTRE, DELHI -110092.

…PETITIONER (Through: Mr. ____________, Advocate)

VERSUS

1. NITIN HOUSE NO.62, GALI NO.3, KARAWAL NAGAR, DELHI -110094.

…RESPONDENT CORAM:

HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, PRESIDENT HON’BLE MS. BIMLA KUMARI, MEMBER (FEMALE)

PER:HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, PRESIDENT

JUDGMENT

1. At the outset, we are of the considered view that issuance of notice to the Respondent is not required in the present revision petition, as the challenge herein is confined to the procedural legality of the filing of written statement within the stipulated period. Further, no adjudication on merits of the consumer complaint is being undertaken at this stage, and the relief sought merely restores the Petitioner’s right of hearing before the District Commissi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top