STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MSEDCL OSMANABAD – Appellant
Versus
VIKRAM SHAMRAO PADWAL – Respondent
Date of filing :25.11.2020 Date of order :12.02.2026 MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,MUMBAI, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
FIRST APPEAL NO. : 517 OF 2020 IN COMPLAINT CASE NO.: 273 OF 2018 DISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSION : OSMANABAD.
1. Maharashtra State Electricity ...Appellants Distribution Company Ltd,. (Adv.P.S.Mehta)
Through its Executive Engineer, 2. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co.Ltd, Through Dy.Executive Engnieer, 3. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co.Ltd, Through Assistant Engineer, R/o Upale, Tq. and Dist.Osmanabad.
VERSUS Vikaram Shamrao Padwal. ... Respondent R/o Upale, Tq.and Dist.Osmanabad. (Adv.A.R.Barate)
CORAM : Milind.S.Sonawane, Hon’ble Presiding Member.
Nagesh C.Kumbre, Hon’ble Member.
J U D G M E N T (Delivered on 12/02/2026)
Per Milind S.Sonawane, Hon’ble Presiding Member.
This is an appeal challenging the correctness and legality of the judgment and order passed by the learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Osmanabad in C.C.No.573/2018 whereby, the District Commission directed the appellants to pay compensation to the respondent of Rs.5,11,194/- for burning his sugarcane crops and set of drip irrigation system
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.