SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 936

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MSEDCL OSMANABAD – Appellant
Versus
VIKRAM SHAMRAO PADWAL – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:PUNIT MEHTA ,Respondent Advocate:

Date of filing :25.11.2020 Date of order :12.02.2026 MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,MUMBAI, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

FIRST APPEAL NO. : 517 OF 2020 IN COMPLAINT CASE NO.: 273 OF 2018 DISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSION : OSMANABAD.

1. Maharashtra State Electricity ...Appellants Distribution Company Ltd,. (Adv.P.S.Mehta)

Through its Executive Engineer, 2. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co.Ltd, Through Dy.Executive Engnieer, 3. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co.Ltd, Through Assistant Engineer, R/o Upale, Tq. and Dist.Osmanabad.

VERSUS Vikaram Shamrao Padwal. ... Respondent R/o Upale, Tq.and Dist.Osmanabad. (Adv.A.R.Barate)

CORAM : Milind.S.Sonawane, Hon’ble Presiding Member.

Nagesh C.Kumbre, Hon’ble Member.

J U D G M E N T (Delivered on 12/02/2026)

Per Milind S.Sonawane, Hon’ble Presiding Member.

This is an appeal challenging the correctness and legality of the judgment and order passed by the learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Osmanabad in C.C.No.573/2018 whereby, the District Commission directed the appellants to pay compensation to the respondent of Rs.5,11,194/- for burning his sugarcane crops and set of drip irrigation system

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top