SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 1012

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
LAXMAN – Appellant
Versus
JILA SAHKARI KEN. BANK – Respondent


M.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION PLOT NO. 76, ARERA HILLS, BHOPAL (M.P.)

APPEAL NO. 1993/2017 Laxman Singh S/o Late Kachru Singh R/o – Himmat Khedi Tahasil Aalot District Ratlam (M.P.) ... Appellant VERSUS.

1. Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Through Branch Manager Branch Aalot Tahasil Aalot District Ratlam (M.P.)

2. The New India Assurance Company Ltd.

Through Divisional Office

115, Station Road Ratlam (M.P.) ... Respondents BEFORE;

HON’BLE JUSTICE SUNITA YADAV, PRESIDENT HON’BLE DR. MONIKA MALIK, MEMBER COUNSEL FOR THE PARTIES:

SHRI RAVINDRA TIWARI, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT.

NONE FOR RESPONDENTS.

O R D E R

( 16.02.2026 )

The following order of the Bench was delivered by Dr.

Monika Malik, Member.

This appeal by the complainant/appellant (hereinafter referred to as ‘complainant’) is directed against the order dated 2.8.2017, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Ratlam (for short ‘District Commission’), in complaint case No. 45/2017, whereby the District Commission has dismissed the complaint filed by him.

2. Facts of the case in brief are that late father of the complainant-Kachru Singh (hereinafter referred to as ‘deceased/ insured’), was having a savi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top