SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 1093

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
KANSHI RAM – Appellant
Versus
UHBVNL – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:RAVI KANT ,Respondent Advocate:

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA FIRST APPEAL NO. SC/6/A/398/2018 KANSHI RAM PRESENT ADDRESS - VPO BIANA, TEHSIL INDRI, DISTT. KARNAL. ,HARYANA.

.......Appellant(s)

Versus UHBVNL PRESENT ADDRESS - KARNAL. ,HARYANA.

.......Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

MR. S . P . SOOD , JUDICIAL MEMBER MR. SURESH CHANDER KAUSHIK , MEMBER FOR THE APPELLANT:

MS. VANSHIKA PROXY COUNSEL FOR MR. RAVI KANT, COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT.

FOR THE RESPONDENT:

MR. SIKANDER BAKSHI, COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENTS.

DATED: 19/02/2026

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA Date of Institution: 20.03.2018 Date of final hearing: 19.02.2026 Date of Order: 19.02.2026 First Appeal No.398 of 2018 IN THE MATTER OF:-

Kanshi Ram S/o Sadhu Ram, R/o VPO Biana, Tehsil Indri, District Karnal.

...Appellant Versus

1. Executive Engineer, S/U Division No.1, UHBVNL, Karnal.

2. S.D.O. Sub-Division, UHBVNL, Garhi Birbal.

…..Respondents CORAM: SH. S.P. SOOD, JUDICIAL MEMBER SH. S.C. KAUSHIK, MEMBER Present:- Ms. Vanshika proxy counsel for Mr. Ravi Kant, counsel for the appellant.

Mr. Sikander Bakshi, counsel for the respondents.

ORDER

PER: S.P. SOOD, JUDICIAL MEMBER:-

Challenge in this appeal has been invited to th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top