STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
RAKESH PUNASE S/o. ATMARAM PUNASE – Appellant
Versus
SHASHI KUMARRAGHUVANSHI Through its LEKHAPAL SHASHI KUMAR RAGHUVANSHI – Respondent
M.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION PLOT NO. 76, ARERA HILLS, BHOPAL (M.P.)
ORDER SHEET APPEAL NO. 185/2026 RAKESH PUNASEY S/O ATMARAM PUNASEY VS.
SHASHI KUMAR RAGHUWANSHI, ACCOUNTANT, STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ANOTHER HYBRID HEARING
19.2.2026 Appellant-Rakesh Punasey, present in person.
Heard.
This appeal arises out of the order dated 16.12.2025, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Harda (for short ‘District Commission’), in complainant case No. 130/2025, whereby the District Commission has dismissed the complaint filed by the complainant/appellant (hereinafter referred to as ‘complainant’), in limine.
2. Appellant, who is present in person submits that by the impugned order the District Commission has dismissed the complaint at the admission stage on the ground that on perusal of complaint it was found that the complainant’s case relates to a cheque, which was dishonoured on the ground of ‘insufficient fund’ instead of ‘stop payment’ and the opposite party/Bank is alleged to have committed deficiency in service. It was observed by the District Commission that as far as the cheque bounce matter is concerned, dishonour of a cheque can occur either d
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.