SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 1209

IN THE DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, President, Bimla Kumari, Member
HDFC BANK LTD. – Appellant
Versus
PREM MALHOTRA – Respondent
FIRST APPEAL 204/2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Amita Kumari
For the Respondents: Yashika Kapoor, Prashant Arora, Simran Khurana, Lakshay Agarwal

A bank cannot exercise the right of lien and set-off to withdraw funds from a customer's account without prior notice, particularly after accepting a settlement amount, as such action constitutes a deficiency in service.

Headnote:The case involves a dispute under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986, where a credit card holder entered into a settlement agreement to pay a specific sum in installments. Although the payment was completed with some delay, the bank subsequently withdrew a significant sum from the customer's salary account, claiming the settlement had become null and void due to the delay and exercising the right of lien and set-off. The court found that the bank had already received the settlement amount and failed to notify the customer that the settlement was revoked before withdrawing funds from the salary account. The primary issue was whether the bank could legally deduct funds under the premise of the right of lien and set-off after having accepted the settlement amount. The court reasoned that while the right of lien and set-off is a recognized legal principle, it cannot be exercised arbitrarily without prior notice, especially when the bank's non-action led the customer to believe the settlement was still valid. The court held that withdrawing funds from a salary account after a considerable lapse of time without authorization constitutes deficient conduct. Consequently, we find no reason to warrant interference with the order passed by the District Commission and the present Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Table of Content
1. background of the credit card settlement and subsequent unauthorized withdrawal from the salary account. (Para 1 , 2 , 8)
2. contention that default in payment renders a settlement void, thereby enabling the bank's right of lien. (Para 3 , 4 , 9)
3. the right of lien and set-off requires prior notice and cannot be exercised after accepting settlement funds. (Para 7 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. upholding the lower commission's order and dismissing the appeal due to deficiency in service. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)

Present: Ms. Amita Kumari, counsel for the appellant, E. mail: gurmeet @ gbalawoffices.com.

Respondent in person, Email: premmalhotra1959@gmail.com

Ms. Yashika Kapoor, counsel for the respondent, Email: adv.yashikakapoor@gmail.com

PER: HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, PRESIDENT

JUDGMENT

1. The facts of the case as per the District Commission record are as under:

“1. The complainant has filed a complaint under Section 12 of Consumer Protection Act 1986 (hereinafter referred to as Act) with the allegations that credit card bearing number 5176521006650701 with credit limit of Rs 70,000/- was issued by OP to him. A dispute has arisen between them which was duly settled in June 2018. He was to pay a sum of Rs. 68180/- in 08 equal installments of Rs. 8522/- each. 06 cheques were duly cleared whereas 02cheques were dishonored upon which he has deposited cash in lieu of dishonored cheques. On 16.12.2009, a sum of Rs. 9180/-was withdrawn from his savings bank account without his consent or approval which is evident from the bank statement for the month of Dec, 2009, In Feb, 2011. OP has issued a legal notice to the effect that they have not received the payment of credit card. The legal notice was duly replied. No communication was received from the OP thereafter.

2. He is having a salary account bearing number 501001984316631 with the OP. In April, 2017 he has applied for fresh credit card at the request of the executive of OP, On 30.05.2017, he was surprised to notice that a sum of Rs. 70,627/- has been blocked by OP and on 14.6.2017, a sum of Rs. 70627/-was illegally withdrawn from his bank account. He contacted OP and tame to know that there is an outstanding amount of Rs. 74,000/- against him. The withdrawal of money from his bank account without his consent and knowledge tantamounts to unfair trade practice. There is a deficiency in service by way of withdrawing the amount from his bank account. He has issued a legal notice dt 24.6.2017 to the OP which was duly replied on 18.07.2017. Hence, this complaint.

2. The OP has filed a reply wherein preliminary objections qua suppression of material facts, maintainability, cause of action and complaint is filed with baseless allegations against the OP are raised. On merits, it is averred that OP is a banking company and engaged in the business of banking, financing and providing credit card facilities to the customers. Ms. Jyoti Rani is the Legal Manager of the OP and duly authorized through power of attorney to file the case. A credit card bearing no. 5176521006650701 was issued to the complainant on filing credit card application form. The credit card agreement is duly received by the complainant which contains the detailed information including late fee charges. The complainant has defaulted in making the payment and settlement between the parties took place. The complainant was to pay Rs. 68,187/- in 08 installments out of which 04 installments were of Rs 8522/- and 04 were of Rs. 5523/- . The amount was to be payable by Feb, 2009. The complainant failed to abide by the settlement and defaulted in making the entire payment. The OP has requested the complainant to honour the settlement but in vain. The settlement has become null and void as per third term & condition of settlement. On 01.12.2009, OP has placed hold on funds of Rs. 23245.68 in favour of OP due to Bankers lien and right of set-off. A letter dt 04.02.2011 was issued to the complainant for conciliati

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top