STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
M/S NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
M/S SURYA ROSHNI LTD. – Respondent
SC/7/A/432/2023
##PAGE1##
FA NO. 432/2023 D.O.D.: 27.02.2026
M/S. NATIONAL INUSRANCE CO. LTD. VS M/S SURYA ROSHNI LTD.
IN THE DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL
COMMISSION
Date of Institution: 24.08.2023
Date of Hearing: 29.01.2026
Date of Decision: 27.02.2026
FIRST APPEAL NO.-432/2023
IN THE MATTER OF
M/S. NATIONAL INUSRANCE CO.LTD.,
HAVING ITS OFFICE AT,
2E/9, JHANDEWALAN EXTENSION,
NEW DELHI,
DELHI-110055
(Through: Mr. Shubham Sharma, Advocate)
…Appellant
VERSUS
M/S. SURYA ROSHNI LTD,
THROUGH ITS SR.V.P.(TAXATION),
SH. RAJEEV KOTHARI,
PADAM TOWER -1, RAJENDRA PLACE,
NEW DELHI – 110008.
(Through: Mr. Harvinder Singh and
Mr. Aman Sharma, Advocates)
…Respondent
MODIFIED PAGE 1 OF 14
##PAGE2##FA NO. 432/2023 D.O.D.: 27.02.2026
M/S. NATIONAL INUSRANCE CO. LTD. VS M/S SURYA ROSHNI LTD.
CORAM:
HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL (PRESIDENT)
HON’BLE MS. BIMLA KUMARI, MEMBER (FEMALE)
Present: Mr. Shubham Sharma and Mr. Sumit Prasad, Counsel for the
Appellant
Mr. Harvinder Singh and Mr. Aman Sharma , Counsel for the
Respondent
PER: HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL,
PRESIDENT
JUDGMENT
1. The facts of the case as per District Commission record are:
“2. The complainant took a car insurance policy for its vehicle
bearing registration no. DL6CJ8027 make/model HONDA CITY 2009
through SMC Insurance Brokers Pvt having Broker Code 289 for
which OP No.3 issued a policy on 22.02.2010 which was valid from
22.02.2010 to 21.02.2011. It was mentioned in the policy bond issued
by the OP No.3 that the OP no. 4 & 5 are the claim settlement
agencies. Needless to say that the complainant paid a sum of Rs.
16,566/- toward premium for the above policy.
3. The complainant states that on 18.02.2011, the above said vehicle
was lost and the complainant duly informed the police on dialing @
100 nos and to this effect, an FIR bearing no. 67/11 in the police
station- Paschim Vihar, Delhi was also registered. The complainant
also informed the OPs about the lost of above said vehicle and
registration of FIR bearing no. 67/11 in the police station- Paschim
Vihar, Delhi. At the time of spot survey, the complainant had shown
both original keys to the surveyor appointed by OPs. The surveyor
also clicked photographs of both original keys of the above said
vehicle.4
4. The complainant further states that untraced vehicle report filed
by the concerned IO of Police was also accepted by the Court of Shri
Rajnder Kumar, learned MM vide his order dated 10.10.2021.
However, the grievance of the complainant is that despite the
MODIFIED PAGE 2 OF 14
##PAGE3##FA NO. 432/2023 D.O.D.: 27.02.2026
M/S. NATIONAL INUSRANCE CO. LTD. VS M/S SURYA ROSHNI LTD.
acceptance of the untraceable report by the Court of learned MM
and fulfilling all the requisites formalities by the complainant, the
OPs have not accepted the insurance claim.
5.It is submitted by the complainant that all affairs concerning the
insurance claim was being looked after by one Mr. Anil Bansal (V.P.
Commercial) and since Mr. Anil Bansal left his job on 16.07.2013
with the complainant therefore the complainant could not follow up
the insurance claim. The complainant further states that the
complainant has also informed OPs about the resignation of Mr. Anil
Bansal and also supplied all the requisite documents vide letter dated
19.05.2015 and email dated 20.05.2015 which were duly
acknowledged by the OPs. However, despite all, OPs had rejected
claim on the ground that it is time barred.
6. It is stated by the complainant that the claim of the complainant
was reconsidered by the OPs in view of the directions issued by the
IRDA in grievance no. GR1140115353 dated 07.10.2014. But despite
all, the OPs vide letter dated 14.07.2015 again repudiated claim of
the complainant on the following grounds:
a. There was a dispute regarding the date, time regarding the
registration of FIR.
b. Since my client had not provided both original keys to you, the
notices. Etc.
7.It is further submitted by the complainant that the complainant has
already informed the OPs regarding the lost of both original keys
and in this regards
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.