SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 38085

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MPEB – Appellant
Versus
SUDARSHAN MAHAJAN – Respondent
SC/23/A/15/877



STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION MADHYA PRADESH FIRST APPEAL NO. SC/23/A/15/877 MPEB PRESENT ADDRESS - POWER HOUSE, SEHORE,MADHYA PRADESH.

.......Appellant(s)

Versus SUDARSHAN MAHAJAN PRESENT ADDRESS - MAIN ROAD, SEHORE, DIST. SEHORE. ,MADHYA PRADESH.

.......Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUNITA YADAV , PRESIDENT HON'BLE MRS. DR. MONIKA MALIK , MEMBER FOR THE APPELLANT:

MPEB FOR THE RESPONDENT:

SUDARSHAN MAHAJAN DATED: 17/09/2025

ORDER

M. P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PLOT NO.76, ARERA HILLS, BHOPAL FIRST APPEAL NO. 876 OF 2015

(Arising out of order dated 10.07.2015 passed in C.C.No. 45/2013 by District Commission, Sehore)

M.P.MADHYA KSHETRA VIDYUT

VITRAN COMPANY LIMITED,

THROUGH EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,

POWER HOUSE, DISTRICT-SEHORE (M.P.) … APPELLANT.

Versus K. U. QURESHI S/O LATE S. U. QURESHI, R/O WASEEM MANJIL, ENGLISHPURA, DISTRICT-SEHORE (M.P.) ... RESPONDENT.

FIRST APPEAL NO. 877 OF 2015 (Arising out of order dated 10.07.2015 passed in C.C.No. 42/2013 by District Commission, Sehore)

M.P.MADHYA KSHETRA VIDYUT VITRAN COMPANY LIMITED, THROUGH EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, POWER HOUSE, DISTRICT-SEHORE (M.P.) … APPELLANT.

Versus SUDERSHAN MAHAJAN S/O SHRI D. C. MAHAJAN, R/O MAIN ROAD, DISTRICT-SEHORE (M.P.) ... RESPONDENT.

FIRST APPEAL NO. 878 OF 2015 (Arising out of order dated 10.07.2015 passed in C.C.No. 70/2013 by District Commission, Sehore)

M.P.MADHYA KSHETRA VIDYUT VITRAN COMPANY LIMITED, THROUGH EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, POWER HOUSE, DISTRICT-SEHORE (M.P.) … APPELLANT.

Versus K.S.BHARGAVA S/O SHRI B. L. BHARGAVA (DECEASED)

THROUGH VIJAY BHARGAVA S/O LATE K. S. BHARGAVA, R/O ENGLISHPURA, DISTRICT-SEHORE (M.P.) ... RESPONDENT.

FIRST APPEAL NO. 879 OF 2015 (Arising out of order dated 10.07.2015 passed in C.C.No. 44/2013 by District Commission, Sehore)

M.P.MADHYA KSHETRA VIDYUT VITRAN COMPANY LIMITED, THROUGH EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, POWER HOUSE, DISTRICT-SEHORE (M.P.) … APPELLANT.

Versus K. U. QURESHI S/O LATE S. U. QURESHI, R/O WASEEM MANJIL, ENGLISHPURA, DISTRICT-SEHORE (M.P.) ... RESPONDENT.

-2-

FIRST APPEAL NO. 880 OF 2015 (Arising out of order dated 10.07.2015 passed in C.C.No. 69/2013 by District Commission, Sehore)

M.P.MADHYA KSHETRA VIDYUT VITRAN COMPANY LIMITED, THROUGH EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, POWER HOUSE, DISTRICT-SEHORE (M.P.) … APPELLANT.

Versus SONPAL DASWANI S/O SHRI R. C. DASWANI R/O ENGLISHPURA, DISTRICT-SEHORE (M.P.) ... RESPONDENT.

BEFORE :

HON’BLE JUSTICE SUNITA YADAV : PRESIDENT HON’BLE DR. MONIKA MALIK : MEMBER COUNSEL FOR PARTIES :

Shri Rajeev Acharya, learned counsel for the appellant.

Ms. Shraddha Vidyarthi, learned counsel for the respondent.

O R D E R

(Passed On 17.09.2025)

Per Say Justice Sunita Yadav, President:

Aforesaid appeals are similar in nature and the point involved is same, therefore taken up together and are being disposed of by this common order. For convenience, facts are taken from First Appeal No.876 of 2015 unless otherwise stated.

2. The opposite party/appellant-M. P. Madhya Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Company Limited (for short ‘electricity company’) has filed this appeal against the order dated 10.07.2015 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Sehore (for short ‘District Commission) in C.C. No. 45/2013 whereby the complaint filed by the complainant/respondent has been allowed.

3. Facts of the case in short as narrated by the complainant/respondent are that he is an Advocate by profession and for legal profession he took electricity connection for his house and chamber in which there is minimum electricity consumption. It is alleged by the complainant that the opposite party/appellant- electricity company illegally converted the domestic electricity connection into non- domestic electricity connection and raising the bills on the basis of non-domestic electricity connection which amounts to deficiency in service on part of the electricity company. The complainant therefore alleging deficiency in service on part of the electricity company filed a complaint before the District Commis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top