STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMAPNY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
GEETA RANI WIDOW OF LATE SH SUSHIL KUMAR – Respondent
SC/4/A/389/2024
##PAGE1##
1
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
U.T., CHANDIGARH
[ADDITIONAL BENCH]
Appeal No. : 389 of 2024
Date of Institution : 04.12.2024
Date of Decision : 31.12.2025
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd., ICICI Lombard House,
414, Veer Savarkar Marg, Near Siddhi Vinayak Temple, Prabhadevi, Mumbai
- 400025
Present Address: 4th Floor, “The Statement”, Plot No.149, Industrial Area
Phase-1, Next to Hometel Hotel, Chandigarh UT – 160002 through its
authorized signatory
….Appellant/Opposite Party No.2
Versus
1] Geeta Rani widow of late Sh. Sushil Kumar, resident of H.No.1020 A,
Preet Colony, Lohgarh, Zirakpur District Mohali, Punjab 140603
…Respondent/Complainant
2] Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. through its Branch Manager SCO No.
337-338, Sector 35-B, Chandigarh
2] Federal Bank through its Branch Manager, Hitpriya Square, Patiala
Road, Zirakpur, District S.A.S. Nagar Mohali
….Proforma Respondents/Opposite Parties No.1 & 3
BEFORE: MRS. PADMA PANDEY, PRESIDING MEMBER
SH. RAJESH K. ARYA, MEMBER
ARGUED BY :-
Sh. Ankur Gupta, Advocate for the appellant (on video conferencing)
Sh. Kapil Kumar Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.1
None for respondent No.2
Service of respondent No.3 dispensed with vide order dated 12.12.2024
PER RAJESH K. ARYA, MEMBER
The instant appeal has been filed by opposite party No.2 – ICICI
Lombard General Insurance Company Limited (appellant herein) for setting
##PAGE2##2
aside order dated 03.07.2024 passed by District Consumer Disputes
Redressal Commission-II, U.T., Chandigarh (hereinafter to be referred as
‘District Commission’) vide which, Consumer Complaint bearing No.673 of
2022 filed by the complainant – Geeta Rani (respondent No.1 herein) has
been partly allowed against the appellant (opposite party No.2) by granting
following relief:-
“11. For the reasons recorded above, the present complaint
deserves to be partly allowed and the same is accordingly partly
allowed. OP No.2-Company is directed to clear the loan account
of the complainant and her husband by crediting the sum
assured of Rs.19,64,889/- maintained with OP No.1 on the date
of death of the LA i.e. 06.12.2021 and to pay the remaining
amount to the complainant along with interest @ 9% p.a. from
07.12.2023 till the date of its actual realization to the
complainant.”
However, the consumer complaint was dismissed against opposite parties
No.1 & 3 (respondents No.2 & 3 herein).
2] In brief, the case of the complainant before the District
Commission was that she and her husband, Sh. Sushil Kumar, availed a housing
loan of ₹20.80 lakhs to purchase a built-up house bearing No.1020-A, Preet
Colony, Lohgarh, Zirakpur, District Mohali (Pb.). The loan was secured by an
insurance policy taken in the name of Sh. Sushil Kumar by paying a premium of
₹80,000/-, which was included in the disbursed loan amount. The complainant
was the nominee under the said policy. Opposite party No.1 assured that in case of
any mishap to the insured, the borrower or his legal heir would not be liable to pay
the outstanding loan amount and Opposite party No.2 would be responsible to
clear the balance loan. On 06.12.2021, Sh. Sushil Kumar suffered severe chest
pain, fell from a chair and was declared to have suffered a heart attack. He was
taken to Civil Hospital, Dera Bassi, where he was declared brought dead.
Thereafter, his son took him to Mehar Hospital, Singpura, Zirakpur, where he was
again declared brought dead. No post-mortem was conducted due to family
reasons. Opposite party No.1 was informed of the death on 27.12.2021 and a claim
was lodged with Opposite party No.2. However, Opposite party No.2 vide letter
dated 25.05.2022 (Annexure C-8) repudiated the claim on the ground that it did
##PAGE3##3
not fall within the coverage of major medical illnesses under the policy. It was
alleged that Opposite party No.2 illegally and arbitrarily rejected the genuine claim.
Accordingly, the complainant filed complaint before the District Commission
seeking directions to Opposite party No.1 not to deduct monthly loan installments
and t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.