STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR CENTRAL GOVT HEALTH SCHEME – Appellant
Versus
RAVINDER SINGH S/o. SH JASWANT SINGH – Respondent
SC/4/FA/199/2025
##PAGE1##
1
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
U.T., CHANDIGARH
[ADDITIONAL BENCH]
Appeal No. : 199 of 2025
Date of Institution : 13.06.2025
Date of Decision : 31.12.2025
Additional Director, Central Government Health Scheme, Kendriya Sadan,
4th Floor, Sector 9-A, Chandigarh - 160009
….Appellant/Opposite Party
Versus
1] Ravinder Singh S/o S. Jaswant Singh R/o House No.50, Good Earth
Colony, Patiala – 147001, Punjab
2] Uttam Kaur W/o Sh. Ravinder Singh R/o House No.50, Good Earth
Colony, Patiala – 147001, Punjab
….Respondents/Complainants
BEFORE: MRS. PADMA PANDEY, PRESIDING MEMBER
SH. RAJESH K. ARYA, MEMBER
ARGUED BY :-
Ms. Komal Preet Chauhan, Advocate (on video conferencing) alongwith
Ms. Muskan, Advocate for the appellant
Sh. Devinder Kumar, Advocate for the respondents alongwith Sh. Ravinder
Singh, Respondent No.1 in person
PER RAJESH K. ARYA, MEMBER
The instant appeal has been filed by the opposite party – The
Additional Director, Central Government Health Scheme (appellant herein)
for setting aside order dated 28.02.2025 passed by District Consumer
Disputes Redressal Commission-II, U.T., Chandigarh (hereinafter to be
referred as ‘District Commission’) vide which, Consumer Complaint bearing
No.290 of 2024 filed by the complainants – Sh. Ravinder Singh and his wife
Smt. Uttam Kaur (respondents herein) has been partly allowed against the
appellant by granting following relief:-
##PAGE2##2
“12] In view of the above discussion, the complaint of
the complainants is partly allowed and the OP is directed
as under: -
i) To reimburse the claim amounts of Rs.6640/- &
Rs.22023/- (Annexure C-VIII) and Rs.36839/- &
Rs.127118/- (Annexure C-IX) to complainants No.1
& 2 respectively alongwith interest @ 9% per annum
from the date of denial of claim till the date of its
actual realization.
ii) To pay Rs.25000/- to the complainants as
compensation for the harassment caused as well as
litigation expenses.
The above said order shall be complied with by the
OP within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of
certified copy of this order.
13] With regard to the reimbursement of medical claim
of Rs.22,799/- in respect of complainant No.1 for the
period 22.07.2024 to 25.12.2024 and Rs.54,812/- in
respect of complainant No.2 for the period 28.03.2024 to
25.12.2024, which have been subsequently claimed by
complainants in their replication and written arguments,
seem not to have been submitted to the OP for
reimbursement. Hence, the same fall outside the purview
of this Commission. Complainants are at liberty to submit
Medical Reimbursement Claim for the said amounts
Rs.22,799/- and Rs.54,812/- with the OP for of
reimbursement. The original medical bills attached with
the replication be returned to the complainants against
receipt after retaining photocopies thereof.”
2] In brief, the case of the complainants before the District
Commission was that complainants No.1 and 2 are husband and wife.
Complainant No.1 retired from the Central Reserve Police Force, while
Complainant No.2 retired from Punjab Government service. At the time of
retirement, Complainant No.1 subscribed to the Central Government Health
Scheme (CGHS) by paying ₹60,000/- and opted to forego the fixed medical
allowance of ₹1,000/- per month with pension. Complainant No.2 also opted
to forego the fixed medical allowance of ₹1,000/- per month to avail OPD
and IPD medical facilities under CGHS. Complainant No.1 suffered a stroke
and remained under treatment at PGI in OPD and was also admitted in PGI
from 11.12.2017 to 17.12.2017 in the Cardiology Department. Thereafter,
he remained under treatment at Govt. Rajindra Hospital, Patiala and Fortis
##PAGE3##3
Hospital, Mohali for emergent cardiac problems. He also suffered from
Covid-19 on 06.04.2021. In view of his deteriorated health condition,
doctors restricted his movements and advised continuation of medicines.
Being resident of Patiala, he purchased medicines locally and underwent
tests from time to time under emergent conditions. Complainant No.2,
Uttam Kaur, also covered under CGHS for OPD
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.