2025 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 39699
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
ANIL NARAYAN – Appellant
Versus
BIMR HOSPITAL – Respondent
SC/23/A/16/327
##PAGE1##
M.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
PLOT NO. 76, ARERA HILLS, BHOPAL (M.P.)
APPEAL NO. 327/2016
Anil Narayan Saxena
S/o Late Kailash Narayan Saxena
R/o Jacchha Khane ke Samney
Laxmiganj, Lashkar
Gwalior (M.P.) ... Appellant
VERSUS.
1. B.I.M.R. Hospital (Birla Hospital)
Through Director
Surya Mandir Road
Residency, Murar
Gwalior (M.P.)
2. Dr. Ravi Shankar Dalmia
B.I.M.R. Hospital
Surya Mandir Road
Residency, Murar
Gwalior (M.P.). ... Respondents
BEFORE;
HON’BLE JUSTICE SUNITA YADAV, PRESIDENT
HON’BLE DR. MONIKA MALIK, MEMBER
COUNSEL FOR THE PARTIES:
SHRI AMIT TIWARI, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT.
NONE FOR RESPONDENTS.
O R D E R
( 31.12.2025 )
The following order of the Bench was delivered by Dr.
Monika Malik, Member.
##PAGE2##: 2 :
This appeal by the complainant/appellant (hereinafter
referred to as ‘complainant’) is directed against the order dated
8.2.2016 passed by the District Consumer Disputes
Redressal Commission, Gwalior (for short ‘District
Commission’), in complaint case No. 187/2014, whereby the
District Commission has dismissed the complaint filed by him.
2. The facts of the case in brief are that the complainant
observed chest pain on 17-18 June, 2013. He visited opposite
parties on 19.6.2013, upon which he was advised angiography.
On 19.6.2013 angiography was done through femoral artery.
After few hours the complainant observed pain and swelling in
his thigh, which developed into infected hematoma. The
complainant was discharged on 27.6.2013 but his condition
was not good. He was thereafter admitted in Medanta Hospital,
where Rs.4,03,305/- were spent in his treatment. The
complainant alleged that the opposite parties did not perform
angiography in proper manner, which led to development of
hematoma, due to which surgery of coronary bypass got
delayed. Therefore, alleging deficiency in service against the
opposite parties, he filed complaint before the District
Commission.
##PAGE3##: 3 :
3. The opposite parties resisted the complaint and
submitted that the complainant was admitted in their hospital on
19.6.2013 with complaints of chest pain since last 10 years.
Angiography was advised in order to see the extent of
blockage. After angiography, it was observed that there was
blockage in all three arteries of complainant’s heart. He was,
therefore, advised (Coronary Artery Bypass Graft) CABG. The
complainant, however, did not give any confirmation, therefore,
CABG could not be done and the complainant was discharged
from their hospital. Therefore, prayer for dismissal of complaint
was made.
4. Heard. Perused the record.
5. Learned counsel for the complainant argued that the
District Commission ignored the submissions of the
complainant and gave no findings with regard to development
of hematoma, on account of angiography performed in
negligent manner. Due to development of said hematoma
there was delay in performing CABG in Medanta Hospital,
since hematoma was to be treated first. Therefore, he prayed
that the impugned order be set aside and the complainant be
granted relief as has been sought in the complaint filed by him.
##PAGE4##: 4 :
6. Undoubtedly angiography was performed by the
opposite parties and as per angiography report there was
blockage in all three arteries of his heart. After discussion he
was advised CABG. The complainant however, alleged that
angiography performed by the opposite parties was not done
in proper manner, due to which he developed hematoma in his
leg. Learned counsel for complainant specifically argued and
stated that the appeal has been filed on the ground that the
District Commission has completely ignored this fact that due to
improper procedure of angiography hematoma developed in
complainant’s leg. This issue was not at-all addressed by the
District Commission. Therefore, when the complainant was
admitted in Medanta Hospital, his hematoma was treated first
and thereafter CABG was performed. Due to treatment
hematoma the procedure of CABG was delayed.
7. We observe that hematoma is known complication of
angiography and development of hematoma