STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
HJ & COMPANY THROUGH ITS PARTNER JASKARAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
THE SUB- DIVISIONAL ENGINEER – Respondent
SC/4/RP/22/2023
##PAGE1##
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
CHANDIGARH
REVISION PETITION NO. SC/4/RP/22/2023
HJ & COMPANY THROUGH ITS PARTNER JASKARAN SINGH
PRESENT ADDRESS - SCO NO. 1038-1039, SECTOR 22-B, CHANDIGARH,CHANDIGARH.
.......Petitioner(s)
Versus
THE SUB- DIVISIONAL ENGINEER
PRESENT ADDRESS - ELECTRICITY OPERATIONAL SUB DIVISION NO 1, SECTOR 23,
CHANDIGARH,CHANDIGARH.
RAJNISH KUMAR
PRESENT ADDRESS - HOUSE NO. 2512 SECTOR 19C CHANDIGARH,CHANDIGARH.
.......Respondent(s)
BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ SHEKHAR ATTRI , PRESIDENT
HON'BLE MR. PREETINDER SINGH , MEMBER
FOR THE PETITIONER:
SHREY GOEL (Advocate)
DATED: 19/12/2025
ORDER
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
U.T., CHANDIGARH
Revision Petition No. : 22 of 2023
Date of Institution : 29.05.2023
Date of Decision : 19.12.2025
HJ & Company, SCO No. 1038-1039, Sector 22-B, Chandigarh, through its Partner Jaskaran Singh S/o
Amarjit Singh. (Mob: 9889555300)
…Revision Petitioner/Complainant
V e r s u s
The Sub-Divisional Engineer, Electricity (Operational) Sub Division No. 1, Sector -23, Chandigarh.
##PAGE2##…..Respondent
Rajnish Kumar S/o Yashpal Sharma R/o House no. 2512, Sector 19 C, Chandigarh.
...Proforma Respondent
BEFORE: JUSTICE RAJ SHEKHAR ATTRI, PRESIDENT
MR.PREETINDER SINGH, MEMBER
Present:- Sh. Shrey Goel and Sh.Shvetanshu Goel, Advocate for the revision petitioner.
Sh.Nitin Bhasin, Advocate for respondent No.1.
Respondent No.2 proceeded against exparte vide order dated 15.09.2023.
JUSTICE RAJ SHEKHAR ATTRI, PRESIDENT.
This revision petition has been filed by the revision petitioner/complainant challenging the order
dated 21.04.2023 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-I, U.T., Chandigarh (the
then District Forum, now referred to in short as the District Commission), vide which miscellaneous
application no.4 of 2019 filed by it for permission to appear and contest the main consumer complaint
bearing no.560 of 1997 was dismissed.
2. Before the District Commission, the applicant had made averments in the application that in the
Rs.
year 1998, the opposite party raised an electricity bill of approximately 1,98,000/- against the then
consumer, Sh. Rajnish Kumar, without any fault on his part. Aggrieved, Sh. Rajnish Kumar approached the
District Commission. Vide order dated 07.11.2007, the District Commission directed the Electrical Inspector
to decide the dispute within two months and stayed recovery of the subject amount. However, the dispute
was never adjudicated by the Electrical Inspector, UT, Chandigarh, and on 12.11.2012 it was stated during
arbitration proceedings that the matter was not maintainable in view of the District Commissions’ order
dated 07.11.2007 and had become time-barred. The opposite party neither challenged the said order nor
sought extension of time and continued to accept current electricity charges without the disputed amount.
Rs.
Despite this, the opposite party issued a bill dated 11.07.2014 reflecting a disputed amount of 2,54,368/-,
which was stayed by the District Commission. The then consumer deposited current charges as demanded,
Rs.
but the opposite party again raised a bill of 2,76,008/- in September 2014. Thereafter, Sh. Rajnish Kumar
approached the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum (CGRF), which declined to decide the matter on the
ground that it was pending before the District Commission. Subsequently, Sh. Rajnish Kumar vacated the
premises and entered into a compromise deed dated 23.05.2017 with the owner, Sh. Sanjeev Kumar, who
##PAGE3##agreed to bear all liabilities arising out of the pending complaint. An application under Section 151 CPC was
filed by Sh. Sanjeev Kumar, and vide order dated 23.02.2018, the matter was again referred to the CGRF.
However, the CGRF dismissed the complaint vide order dated 19.07.2018 for want of jurisdiction. The
present applicant purchased the premises on 14.07.2017 and claimed to have stepped into the shoes of the
previous consumer/owner, seeking restoration of the original complaint and adjudication of the subject bill
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.