STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
DIVI.MGR – Appellant
Versus
CHANDRAN – Respondent
SC/32/A/194/2017
##PAGE1##
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
KERALA
FIRST APPEAL NO. SC/32/A/194/2017
DIVI.MGR
PRESENT ADDRESS - Southern railway , Palakkad, Kerala,KERALA.
.......Appellant(s)
Versus
CHANDRAN
PRESENT ADDRESS - S/o Narayanan, Attayil house, Puthupally, P.O. B.P. Angadi, Tirur,
Malappuram,KERALA.
.......Respondent(s)
BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SRI.B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR , PRESIDENT
HON'BLE MR. SRI.AJITH KUMAR.D , JUDICIAL MEMBER
SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN.K.R , MEMBER
FOR THE APPELLANT:
NEMO
FOR THE RESPONDENT:
NEMO
DATED: 28/01/2026
ORDER
KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
APPEAL No.194/2017
ORDER DATED : 28.01.2026
(Against the in C.C.No.195/2014 on the files of DCDRC, Malappuram)
PRESENT:
HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR : PRESIDENT
SRI. AJITH KUMAR D. : JUDICIAL MEMBER
##PAGE2##SRI.K.R.RADHAKRISHNAN : MEMBER
APPELLANT:
Divisional Manager, Southern Railway, Palakkad
(by Adv. S. Renganathan)
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
Chandran, S/o Narayanan, Attayil House, Puthuppally, P.O.B.P. Angadi,
Tirur, Malappuram
(by Adv. Kulathoor L.R. Rahul)
ORDER
HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR : PRESIDENT
The appellant is the opposite party in C.C.No.195/2014 on the files of the
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Malappuram (for short, ‘the
District Commission’).
##PAGE3##2. The complainant sent 10 articles to Tirur railway station from Tiruvaur in
Tamil Nadu on 29.09.2013. Out of the said 10 articles, 8 articles were received by the
complainant in good condition on 11.10.2013. One of the two articles reached the
railway station subsequently was an almirah, which sustained damage in transit.
Though notice was issued by the complainant, the opposite party neither replied nor
paid the value of the almirah.
3. The opposite party filed a version admitting the transporting of the articles
in the railway by the complainant. It was contended by the opposite party that out of
the 10 articles, 8 articles were collected by the complainant on 02.10.2013. The
remaining two articles did not reach the railway station on that date. Therefore, a
partial delivery certificate dated 02.10.2013 was given to the complainant. Thereafter,
the above said two items were received on 12.10.2013. The complainant was informed
about the arrival of the said items. However, the complainant refused to accept
delivery of the said articles. The opposite party sent a registered letter to the
complainant which was received by the complainant on 11.11.2013. However, the
complainant refused to take delivery of the said articles even after receiving the
registered notice.
4. Before the District Commission, PW1 was examined and Exhibits A1 to
A5 were marked for the complainant. Exhibits B1 to B17 were marked for the
opposite party. After evaluating the evidence, the District Commission allowed the
##PAGE4##complaint and directed the opposite party to pay Rs.20,000/- as compensation towards
the deficiency in service, Rs.2,500/-as compensation towards damages for the loss of
articles, to the complainant. The opposite party was permitted to deduct the amount of
Rs.1,048/-, which was the wharf charge due to the opposite party, from the
compensation. The District Commission also directed the opposite party to pay
Rs.10,000/- as costs to the complainant.
5. Service is complete. However, there is no representation for the
respondent.
6. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. Perused the records.
7. The learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that in view of the
provisions under Section 13 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, the Consumer
Commission has no jurisdiction to entertain a claim for loss, destruction, damage,
deterioration or non - delivery of animals or goods entrusted with a railway
administration for carriage by railway. Admittedly, the contention of the complainant
is that out of the 10 articles sent by the complainant through the opposite party, one of
the articles wasdamaged. The above claim arose out of the transport of the goods
through the railway.
8. Section 13 of t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.