STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
DR. JAYKUMAR S/O ASHWINKUMAR DIXIT – Appellant
Versus
MANOHAR BAPURAO KHORGADE – Respondent
SC/CB2/27/A/124/2019
##PAGE1##
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
CIRCUIT BENCH NAGPUR
FIRST APPEAL NO. SC/CB2/27/A/516/2018
SHRI. MANOHAR BAPURAO KHORGADE
PRESENT ADDRESS - R/O. FLAT NO. A/10/5, N.S.K. SOCIETY, RAVI NAGAR, CIVIL LINES,
NAGPUR-440 001,MAHARASHTRA.
.......Appellant(s)
Versus
DR. JAYKUMAR DIXIT
PRESENT ADDRESS - MEDICAL PRACTITIONER, R/O. 101/102, NANDINI GARDEN
APARTMENTS INFRONT OF CONGRESS NAGAR GARDEN, CONGRESS NAGAR, NAGPUR-
440 012,MAHARASHTRA.
DR. SWARNIM JAYKUMAR DIXIT
PRESENT ADDRESS - MEDICAL PRACTITIONER, R/O. 101/102, NANDINI GARDEN
APARTMENTS INFRONT OF CONGRESS NAGAR GARDEN, CONGRESS NAGAR, NAGPUR-
440 012,MAHARASHTRA.
DR. SMT. PUNAM SWARNAKUMAR DIXIT
PRESENT ADDRESS - MEDICAL PRACTITIONER R/O. 101/102, NANDINI GARDEN
APARTMENTS INFRONT OF CONGRESS NAGAR GARDEN, CONGRESS NAGAR, NAGPUR-
440 012,MAHARASHTRA.
.......Respondent(s)
FIRST APPEAL NO. SC/CB2/27/A/124/2019
DR. JAYKUMAR S/O ASHWINKUMAR DIXIT
PRESENT ADDRESS - OCCUPATION MEDICAL PRACTITIONER R/O. 101-102, NANDINI
GARDEN APARTMENTS, BEFORE CONGRESS NAGAR GARDEN, CONGRESS NAGAR,
NAGPUR,MAHARASHTRA.
DR. SWARNIM S/O JAYKUMAR DIXIT
PRESENT ADDRESS - OCCUPATION MEDICAL PRACTITIONER R/O. 101-102, NANDINI
GARDEN APARTMENTS, BEFORE CONGRESS NAGAR GARDEN, CONGRESS NAGAR,
NAGPUR,MAHARASHTRA.
DR. SMT. PUNAM SWARNIM DIXIT
PRESENT ADDRESS - OCCUPATION MEDICAL PRACTITIONER R/O. 101-102, NANDINI
GARDEN APARTMENTS, BEFORE CONGRESS NAGAR GARDEN, CONGRESS NAGAR,
NAGPUR,MAHARASHTRA.
.......Appellant(s)
Versus
MANOHAR BAPURAO KHORGADE
PRESENT ADDRESS - R/O. FLAT NO. A/10/5, NSK SOCIETY, RAVINAGAR, CIVIL LINES,
NAGPUR,MAHARASHTRA.
##PAGE2##.......Respondent(s)
BEFORE:
HON'BLE MRS. KALYANI KAPSE , PRESIDING MEMBER
HON'BLE MS. SHAILA D. WANDHARE , MEMBER
FOR THE APPELLANT:
ADV. RADKE FOR THE COMPLAINANT.
FOR THE RESPONDENT:
ADV. DESHPANDE FOR THE O.P. NOS. 1 TO 3
DATED: 30/01/2026
ORDER
COMMON ORDER
(Delivered on 30/01/2026)
PER MS. S.D. WANDHARE , HON’BLE MEMBER.
01. The Appeal (FA No.18/516) preferred by Manohar Bapurao
Khorgade (original complainant) and another appeal (FA No.19/124)
preferred by Dr.Jaykumar Dixit, Dr.Swarnim Jaykumar Dixit and
Dr.Punam Swarnimkumar Dixit (original O.P.Nos.1 to 3) being aggrieved
by the order passed on 24/10/2018 of the learned Additional District
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Nagpur (for short as “learned
District Forum”) in Consumer Complaint No.RBT/CC/18/250, vide Section
15 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986.
02. The parties of both the appeals are hereinafter referred to their
original nomenclature as complainant and opposite parties respectively
for better appreciation.
03. The facts emerge from these appeals are that the complainant is
a retired government employee residing at Nagpur and has been
##PAGE3##suffering from diabetes since the year 2010. It is alleged that the
complainant was induced by a newspaper advertisement issued by
Opposite Party (O.P.) No.1, a B.A.M.S. practitioner, wherein it was
claimed that diabetes could be permanently cured by ear acupuncture
without use of medicines or insulin. It was also represented that the said
treatment was unique, painless and effective and the treatment was
conducted at the diabetes clinic at Nagpur with the assistance of O.P.
Nos.2 and 3. The complainant approached O.P. No.1 on 22/02/2010,
relying upon such representations and agreed to undergo the said
treatment. The complainant paid an initial amount and thereafter paid
amounts from time to time towards treatment, which in total came to
about 46,000/-, mostly in cash, without issuance of proper receipts. The
complainant underwent treatment for a prolonged period and strictly
followed the instructions given by the opposite parties. The complainant
also regularly underwent blood sugar tests during the course of
treatment. However, despite continuous treatment, the blood sugar levels
of the complainant did not reduce. On the contrary, the blood sugar levels
gradually increased. The condition of the complainant deteriorated over
the time. The complainant suffered serious health complications including
adve
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.