STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T., CHANDIGARH [ADDITIONAL BENCH]

Appeal No. : 292 of 2025 Date of Institution : 17.10.2025 Date of Decision : 26.02.2026 Dr. Vikas Mehra resident of House No.1501, Sector-33-D, Chandigarh-

160033 …..Appellant/Complainant VERSUS

1. State Bank of India through its Branch Manager, GMCH Branch, Sector-32, Chandigarh-160032

2. State Bank of India through its Chairperson, Corporate Centre, State Bank Bhavan, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021 …..Respondents/Opposite parties BEFORE: MRS. PADMA PANDEY, PRESIDING MEMBER Mr. RAJESH K. ARYA, MEMBER Argued by:

Sh. Mahesh Kumar Jindia, Advocate for the appellant Sh. Ish Mahajan, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2 PER PADMA PANDEY, PRESIDING MEMBER The complainant – Dr. Vikas Mehra (appellant herein) has filed the instant appeal seeking setting aside of the impugned order dated 01.09.2025 vide which the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-I, U.T., Chandigarh (for short ‘District Commission’), has dismissed his consumer complaint bearing No.73 of

2025 by leaving the parties to bear their own costs.

2] The case of the appellant/complainant before the District Commission was that on 09.01.2024, when he