SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 1637

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
The Archana Travels – Appellant
Versus
Shiva Karunakar – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:M/s.KVRVarma ,Respondent Advocate:

BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.

F.A.No. 599 OF 2022 AGAINST ORDERS IN C.C.11/2020 DISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSION, RANGA REDDY Between:

1. The Archana Travels, Rep. by its Proprietor Sri B.Boji Reddy, Office at 11-14-518/1, Ground Floor, Siris Road, Snehapuri Colony, L.B.Nagar, Ranga Reddy District-74.

2. Sri B.Boji Reddy, Proprietor of Archana Travels, O/o Archana Complex, 1st Floor, Bhainsa, Adilabad District, Telangana, 504104.

………..Appellants/ Opposite Parties And:

1. Shiva Karunkar, S/o Shiva Balaswamy, Aged about 53 years, 2. Smt. Shiva Haritha, W/o Shiva Karunakar, Aged about 46 years.

Both are R/o Flat No.314, 3rd Floor, Sudaram Apartment, Rama Raju Nagar Colony, Suchitra Circle, Ranga Reddy District.

………Respondents/Complainants Counsel for the Appellants/Opposite Parties : M/s. K.V.R.Varma Counsel for the Respondents/Complainants : Sri P. Naveen Kumar HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE DR.G.RADHA RANI, PRESIDENT HON’BLE SMT. MEENA RAMANATHAN, MEMBER (NJ)

MONDAY, THE 9th DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND TWENTY SIX *******

Order :

PER HON’BLE SMT. MEENA RAMANATHAN, MEMBER (NON-JUDICIAL)

1. The appeal is filed u/s 41 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 by the Oppo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top