SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 1649

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
RAJ KUMAR KALRA – Appellant
Versus
TDI PVT LTD. – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:ANIL GOEL ,Respondent Advocate:

IN THE DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION Date of Institution: 22.11.2022 Date of hearing: 15.12.2025 Date of Decision: 10.03.2026 COMPLAINT CASE NO.- 199/2022 IN THE MATTER OF

1. MR. RAJ KUMAR KALRA, 2. MS. AMBIKA KALRA, W/O MR. RAJ KUMAR KALRA.

BOTH R/O A-266, DERAWAL NAGAR, DELHI – 110009.

(Through: Mr. Anil Goel, Advocate)

…Complainants VERSUS TDI INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD., THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, FORMERLY INTIME PROMOTERS PVT LTD., REGD. OFF. 9, K.G. MARG, NEW DELHI -110001.

(Through: Mr. Vaibhav Agnihotri, Advocate)

…Opposite Party CORAM:

HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL (PRESIDENT)

HON’BLE MS. BIMLA KUMARI, MEMBER (FEMALE)

Present: Ms. Ayushi Kapoor, proxy counsel for the complainants on VC.

Mr. Dhruv Sharma, counsel for the OP on VC.

PER: HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL (PRESIDENT)

JUDGMENT

1. The present complaint was returned by the District Commission vide order dated 26.09.2022 on the ground of lack of pecuniary jurisdiction, filed by the Complainants before this Commission. The Complainants filed an amended complaint before the District Commission and the same was accepted by it. The Complainants have sought the following reliefs against the Oppo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top