SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 2164

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Manjula – Appellant
Versus
Gulbarga Electricity Supply Company Ltd – Respondent
SC/29/CC/76/2021



Petitioner Advocates:Mohan Malge ,Respondent Advocate: PTP 1-4

Date of filing: 30.09.2021 Date of disposal: 06.02.2026 BEFORE THE KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES (PRINCIPAL REDRESSAL COMMISSION. BENGALURU BENCH)

DATED: O6th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2026 PRESENT CoRAM: HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA - PRESIDENT and HON,BLE MTS. DIVYASHREE M - LADY MEMBER scl29lccl76l202L

1) Smt, Manjula, W/o. Shivakumar, Muchalambe, D/o. Channabasappa Sidramshetty, Aged About 45 years, R/at: Sikindrapura, 19-6-218, Shivnagar north Bidar, Taluk and District, Bidar-585401.

2) Sri. Santoshkumar, S/o. Channabasappa SidramshettY, Aged About 43 years, R/at: Sikindrapura, t9-6-2L8, Shivnagar north Bidar, Taluk and District, Bidar-585401.

(Rep. by Sri. Mohan Malge, .....Complainant,/s.

Advocate)

-Yls -

1) Gulbarga Electricity SuPPIY Company Limited, No.27, Sy. No.2, New Ghatage Layout, Near Kampbels School, Kalabu ragi-585103.

(Rep. by its Sub-Chief Electrical Inspector)

2) Executive Engineer (EE), O&MDivision,GESCOM, Bidar-585 401.

3) The Superintendent Engineer (Ele), O & M Circle, GESCOM, -

Bidar 585 401.

4) Assistant Executive Engineer (V), Function and Custody Division, GESCOM, Kamathana Taluk and District, Bidar, (Rep. by Sri. Prashanth.T.Pandith, .....Opposite party/s.

Advocate)

ORAL ORDER (PER:HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA, PRESIDENT)

This complaint is filed seeking direction to the opposite party to pay Rs.1,98,40,000/- with interest at 24o/o and also award future loss of income for 12 years for the 400 Mango Trees at Rs.3,84,00,000/-.

2. The brief facts of the complaint is that, complainant Nos.1 & 2 are the sister and brother. Land in Sy. No.201/4 measuring 07 acres of land situated at Sikkindarpura Village, Kamathana Hobli, Bidar Taluk, belonging to the complainants standing in the name of complainant No,1, In the said land they have grown the Mango and Malbar Neem tree and there is an IP pump set in the said land with electricity connection RR bearing No. SDIP-36159. The land was fitted with the drip irrigation to the IP pump set. The complainants have since taken electricity from the opposite parties they become the consumers. The opposite parties have drawn 433 watts of electric write line in the said land to contact the other surrounding area and electrical work was done by the opposite party No.4.

2(a).

an electric arking and short circuit in the line drawn on the land of the complainants. Due to which the 400 Mango Trees and 800 Neem Trees were burnt. The opposite parties are not properly maintained the electrical lines and because of negligent act of the opposite parties the electric ark was caused the short circuit. The incident was reported to the GESCOM/opposite parties who have visited the spot and inspected the same and also the Electrical Inspector of Government of Karnataka has inspected the spot and assessed the damage. The Executive Engineer, GESCOM, has also confirmed the electrical arking, not properly maintaining the electrical line, On 14.72.2019 at about 01.00 PM, there was cause of the incident. Thasildhar also inspected the spot. Police have also inspected the spot and the Horticulture Department at Rs.72,2BBl- per tree and Malabar Neem Trees were made by the Forest Department at Rs.9,156/- per tree. The complainant has suffered the loss of income due to burning of, valuation of the Mango Trees were made by the trees and the income even if it is taken for minimum of 03 years, they could have earned not less than Rs.64,00,000/-. Since the opposite parties have failed to compensate the complainants, pleading deficiency of service they have filed the present complaint.

3. Opposite parties have filed the version opposing the claim by filing their version denying the contentions raised by the complainants. It is contended that, Under Section 161 of the Indian Electricity Act, there is no provision for providing damage to the trees, as it covers only human and animal damage. There is no part, deficiency of service on their Complainants are not entitled for any compensation. The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top