SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 2255

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Life Insurance Corporation of India – Appellant
Versus
M.Prasanna Laxmi – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Hrishikesh Ganu ,Respondent Advocate:

BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD. FA.NO.569 OF 2022 AGAINST ORDERS IN CC.NO.20 OF 2021, DISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSION, KHAMMAM Between:

Life Insurance Corporation of India, Rep. by its Branch Manager, Opp. Tribal Welfare Gurukula Patasala, Cherla Road, Bhadrachalam Branch, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

……Appellant/Opposite Party And M.Prasanna Laxmi, W/o.Late Srinivasa Chary, Aged 40 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o.H.No.12-2-64, G.C.C. Road, Bhadrachalam, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

……Respondent/Complainant Counsel for the Appellant/Opposite Party: M/s.Ramakrishna Varada Mr.Hrishikesh Ganu Counsel for the Respondent/Complainant: M/s. KNS Sampath Kumar QUORAM:

HON’BLE SMT.JUSTICE DR.G.RADHA RANI ……PRESIDENT &

HON’BLE SMT.MEENA RAMANATHAN ……MEMBER (NON-JUDICIAL)

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND TWENTY SIX ******

Order: (Per Smt.Dr.G.Radha Rani, Hon’ble President)

1. This appeal is preferred by the Opposite Party aggrieved by the orders dated 27.04.2022 in CC.No.20/2021 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Khammam.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are hereinafter referred as arrayed before the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top