Back
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
G.Radha Rani, President, Meena Ramanathan, Member
Suresh Sundaram – Appellant
Versus
Vasanthi Housing Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of complaint, defense, evidence, and district dismissal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. appeal grounds and points for consideration. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. agreement terms and construction completion verified. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. default justifies valid cancellation per clauses. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. partial relief: refund with interest, reject possession. (Para 17 , 18) |
Order:
(Per Smt.Dr.G.Radha Rani, Hon’ble President)
1. This appeal is filed by the Complainant aggrieved by the order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-II, Hyderabad in CC.No.25/2021 dated 26.07.2022 for dismissing the complaint filed by him.
2. (a) The case of the Complainant was that, the Complainant filed the case pertaining to deficiency in service of the Opposite Party No.1 in not completing the construction of the apartment No.106, 1st Floor, Type-2 and 1/2 BHK, E-Block together with built up area admeasuring 1030.06 square feet, common area 171 square feet and undivided share of land admeasuring 45.93 square yards out of 23,804.24 square yards forming part of survey No.4/A, 4/AA situated at Peeramcheruvu Village and G.P.Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy Distric
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
