SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 2310

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Poonam V. Maharshi, President, Nisha Amol Chavhan, Judicial Member
Dnyaneshwar Tukaram Wagh – Appellant
Versus
Hyundai Motor Ind. Ltd. – Respondent
Consumer Complaint No. SC/27/CC/16/113



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: P.R. Raskar
For the Respondents: Vandana S. Mishra

A consumer is entitled to claim damages for mental agony and deficiency in service, such as the suppression of expert reports, even after receiving insurance reimbursement for direct pecuniary losses, provided the secondary claim addresses a distinct, non-pecuniary harm not covered by the original indemnity.

Headnote:(A) Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section 12 - Deficiency in service - Vehicle accident due to manufacturing defect - Insurance reimbursement received for repairs and medical expenses - Whether maintainable for non-pecuniary losses. (Paras 1, 21, 23)

(B) Unfair Trade Practice - Withholding of expert/surveyor report - Failure to provide report to consumer - Amounts to deficiency in service. (Para 24)

Facts of the case:
The complainant purchased a new vehicle which met with an accident due to an alleged technical failure. Following repairs, the complainant received reimbursements from an insurance company for mechanical repairs and medical expenses. The complainant alleged that the manufacturer withheld the survey/expert report and requested a replacement vehicle and additional compensation for physical and mental agony.

Findings of Court:
While the claim for direct financial loss (already reimbursed) was untenable, the court found the manufacturer guilty of unfair trade practice for withholding the expert report. The court directed providing the report and awarded compensation for mental agony and litigation costs. (Paras 24, 26, 28)

Issues: Whether the complaint is maintainable despite prior insurance reimbursement for damages; whether withholding a surveyor/expert report constitutes deficiency in service; and whether compensation for mental agony is awardable.

Ratio Decidendi: Insurance indemnity covers pecuniary losses, but does not preclude claims for non-pecuniary losses like mental agony caused by deficient service or unfair trade practices; suppressing material evidence (expert reports) from a consumer impedes fair adjudication and constitutes actionable deficiency. (Paras 23, 24, 25)

Result: Complaint partly allowed; compensation awarded.

Table of Content
1. summary of facts involving complaint against manufacturer for defective vehicle and injury. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
2. opponent arguments regarding jurisdiction and maintainability following insurance settlement. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
3. principle of indemnity prevents double recovery for identical pecuniary losses. (Para 21 , 22 , 23)
4. suppression of technical evidence constitutes unfair trade practice; non-pecuniary losses are recoverable. (Para 24 , 25 , 26)
5. final orders and directives based on findings of deficiency. (Para 27 , 28)

JUDGMENT

(Date: 02-04-2026)

Per: Hon’ble Mrs. Dr. Nisha Amol Chavhan, Member

1. The present Consumer Complaint No. CC/113/2016 is filed under the provisions of Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by the complainant against Opponents.

2. The brief facts of the case of Complainant that, he is working as Software Engineer in the Ltd. Company by name Deloitte Consulting India Ltd., situated at Powai, Mumbai.

3. The Complainant stated that he has to travel from Kalyan to Powai for his job so he decided to purchase vehicle for traveling and convenience. Accordingly he purchased the four wheeler car from M/s Rilu Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. and the model of the car is "New 120 GL ASTA 1.2" on 1st February 2015 for the total cost of Rs.6.83.276/-.

4. The Complainant stated that, the said car is manufactured by Hyundai Motors India Ltd. And said company has given the insurance policy that is private cars package policy through ICICI-Lombard Gen. Insurance Company Ltd. The Registration No. allotted to this car is MH-05-CH-3684; The Complainant purchased the said vehicle from the Opponent No. 2 by availing the vehicle loan from HDFC Bank.

5. The Complainant further stated that he used to drive himself from Kalyan to Powai, Mumbai upto June 2015, the said car has been run nearly 5700 kms for the period of nearby 4 months. At that relevant time, Complainant did not face any problem in running the said car.

6. The Complainant further submitted that during the warranty period of 3 years, the Complainant has given the said car for the maintenance, servicing to the Authorised Service Centre in the month of March 2015 and Dec. 2015. The condition of the said car was good and running condition. The said Authorised Service Centre did not show any fault in any spare part of the car.

7. The Complainant submitted that on dated 10-06-2015 he started to drive the car at 7 o'clock in the morning from Narayangaon and car had been run nearby 15 kms on the NH-04 leads to Sangamner. While driving, suddenly the breaks of the car were failed and the steering wheel became inoperative. The said thing happened due to dismantle of the Engine mount because of the broken of the 3 screws which are the mediator and joining parts between steering and engine. Resultantly, the movement of the front wheels were stopped and the car was moving speedily in circle and the car after moving fell in the off road place and stopped. Fortunately there were no death incidents. After the accident, the relative of the complainant by name Sachin Shinde had took the photography in his mobile phone at the relevant time.

8. The Complainant submitted that, there were no severe injuries who were sitting in the complainant's car. However, he himself injured and was not able walk therefore he was hospitalized in Dhande Multispeciality Clinic. Doctor had examined and given medical treatment of first aid. Thereafter, he came at Kalyan at 12.06.2015 by private vehicle. However, after taking the complete bed rest, suddenly on 25.06.2015, the complainant has lost sensations of his left leg and was feeling uneasy. Due to sudden illness he had been taken in the "Pulse Hospital", Kalyan (West) and taken treatment from the doctor by name Dr. Prafulla Wadatkar, M. S. Ortho. Thereafter, the complainant was hospitalized in the said Hospital for the period from 29.06.2015 to 01.07.2015 (3 days).

9.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top