SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 2355

ADDITIONAL BENCH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, CHANDIGARH
H.P.S. Mahal, Presiding Judicial Member, Kiran Sibal, Member
UCO BANK Through its Branch Manager – Appellant
Versus
LIPIKA MITTAL D/o. Ajit Kumar Mittal – Respondent
First Appeal No.116 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sumit Narang
For the Respondents: Kashish Garg

A bank is not liable for unauthorized electronic transactions if the loss is caused by the customer's own negligence, such as clicking unverified links or downloading unauthorized applications, as per RBI guidelines on limited liability.

Headnote:The matter involves an appeal under Section 41 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, regarding the liability of a bank for unauthorized UPI transactions. The complainant alleged that Rs. 2 lakh was fraudulently transferred from a joint saving account without authorization or sharing of OTP, leading the District Commission to find the bank deficient in service and order a refund. The primary issue was whether the loss resulted from the bank's negligence or the customer's own actions. The court observed that the customer had clicked on unverified links from a search engine to download a third-party application and made small payments to fraudsters, which constituted gross negligence. The court relied on the RBI Circular regarding limiting liability of customers in unauthorized electronic banking transactions, specifically noting that a customer bears the entire loss if the loss is due to their own negligence, such as sharing payment credentials or facilitating access. In view of the customer's negligence, the appeal of the appellant is allowed and the impugned order of the District Commission is hereby set aside. Resultantly the complaint filed by the Complainant stands dismissed.

Table of Content
1. summary of the fraudulent upi transactions and the lower court's finding of deficiency in service. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. contention regarding whether the loss was due to customer negligence or bank's failure to provide a secure system. (Para 7 , 8)
3. determination that clicking unverified links and downloading unknown apps constitutes customer negligence. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. application of rbi guidelines stating customers bear the loss for unauthorized transactions resulting from their own negligence. (Para 13)
5. setting aside the district commission's order and dismissing the complaint based on customer negligence. (Para 14 , 15 , 16)

KIRAN SIBAL, MEMBER :-

This appeal has been preferred by the appellant/Opposite party against order dated 18.09.2024 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bathinda (in short, “the District Commission”), whereby the complaint filed by respondent/complainant against opposite party (in short ‘OP’) was partly allowed while granting the following relief:-

“18. In view of what has been discussed above, the present complaint is hereby partly allowed OP and OP is directed to refund/pay Rs.2 lacs to the complainant within a period of 45 days alongwith interest @6% from date of transactions in dispute i.e. 04.02.2023 till realization and OP is also burdened with Rs.10,000/- as compensation and litigation expenses.

19. In case of non-compliance of the order within the stipulated period, OP will be liable to pay the said amount Rs.2 lacs alongwith interest @9% per annum till realization.”

2. It would be apposite to mention that hereinafter the parties will be referred, as have been arrayed before the District Commission.

3. Brief facts, as averred in the complaint, are that the complainant and her father were having a joint saving account bearing No.01350100009918 with the OP-Bank and there was sufficient balance in the said account. On 04.02.2023 at about 6:24 PM an amount of Rs.2 lakh was fraudulently got transferred from the said account without any authorization from the complainant and her father and even they neither shared any OTP nor called for any OTP. Thereafter, the complainant immediately made telephonic call to Toll Free number of OP and requested to freeze and block the said saving account. The complainant also reported the matter to cyber crime as well as to the OP for doing necessary action to save the fraudulent transfer of entries made without any authorization by the complainant. The complainant also send emails to OP on the same day but no action whatsoever was taken by it to stop the fraud or to block the entry, rather after much persuasion only an amount of Rs.10,000/- was got frozen by the OP Bank. The OP was not having any proper system to avoid the online fraud, although the complainant notified the fraud immediately i.e. within few minutes of detection of fraud but nothing was done by it to save the hard earned money of the complainant. As per the guidelines of RBI, OP is liable for unauthorized transaction but it failed to refund the said amount. Alleging deficiency in service on the part of OP, the complainant filed consumer complaint before the District Commission and sought directions against the OP to refund an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- illegally deducted from the account of the complainant and further to pay Rs.50,000/- as compensation on account of metal tension, agony and harassment; besides, Rs.25,000/- as cost of litigation.

4. In reply to complaint OP stated that as per written complaint submitted to the Bank dated 06.02.2023, the complainant relied upon customer care numbers from search engines and did not use contact information from the official website to reach customer care. Further, she clicked the unknown link and dialed No.09692901502 given by search engine and followed the instruction given by the message of the above noted mobile number and again clicked the second unknown link. The complainant was totall

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top