STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
UCO BANK Through its Branch Manager – Appellant
Versus
LIPIKA MITTAL D/o. Ajit Kumar Mittal – Respondent
ADDITIONAL BENCH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, CHANDIGARH.
Date of Institution: 10.02.2025 Reserved on : 16.02.2026 Decided on : 02.03.2026 UCO Bank through its Manager, Amrik Singh Road, Bathinda.
.….Appellant/opposite party Versus Lipika Mittal daughter of Shri Ajit Kumar, resident of # 628, Model Town, Phase-1, Bathinda.
.....Respondent/complainant First Appeal under Section 41 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 against order dated 18.09.2024 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bathinda, in CC/320/2023 Quorum:-
Mr. H.P.S. Mahal, Presiding Judicial Member Ms. Kiran Sibal, Member Present:-
For the appellant : Sh. Sumit Narang, Advocate For respondent : Sh.Kashish Garg, Advocate KIRAN SIBAL, MEMBER:-
This appeal has been preferred by the appellant/Opposite party against order dated 18.09.2024 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bathinda (in short, “the District Commission”), whereby the complaint filed by respondent/complainant against opposite party (in short ‘OP’) was partly allowed while granting the following relief:-
“18. In view of what has been discussed above, the present complaint is hereby partly allowed OP
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.