STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
PUDA – Appellant
Versus
RAJEEV THAKUR – Respondent
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, CHANDIGARH.
Date of institution : 04.09.2025 Reserved On : 20.02.2026 Date of decision : 09.03.2026 PUDA, Patiala through its Chairman, PUDA Enclave, Nabha, through its Authorized Signatory now through Estate Officer, Patiala Development Authority, having its Office at Urban Estate, Phase-2, Patiala.
….Appellant/Opposite Party Versus Rajeev Thakur aged about 39 years son of Sh. Ramesh Kumar Thakur, resident of House No.B-35/79, Bakshi Gandha Singh, Patiala.
….Respondent/Complainant First Appeal under Section 41 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 against the order dated 10.02.2025 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Patiala.
Quorum:-
Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Daya Chaudhary, President Ms. Simarjot Kaur, Member
1) Whether Reporters of the Newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes/No
2) To be referred to the Reporters or not? Yes/No
3) Whether Judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No Present:-
For the Appellant : Mr. Shashank Bhandari, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Kartikeya Puri, Advocate JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY, PRESIDENT Appellant/opposite party (OP) i.e. Punjab Urban Planning and Development
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.