SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 2410

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
PUDA – Appellant
Versus
RAJEEV THAKUR – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MRINAL DEWAN ,Respondent Advocate:

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, CHANDIGARH.

Date of institution : 04.09.2025 Reserved On : 20.02.2026 Date of decision : 09.03.2026 PUDA, Patiala through its Chairman, PUDA Enclave, Nabha, through its Authorized Signatory now through Estate Officer, Patiala Development Authority, having its Office at Urban Estate, Phase-2, Patiala.

….Appellant/Opposite Party Versus Rajeev Thakur aged about 39 years son of Sh. Ramesh Kumar Thakur, resident of House No.B-35/79, Bakshi Gandha Singh, Patiala.

….Respondent/Complainant First Appeal under Section 41 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 against the order dated 10.02.2025 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Patiala.

Quorum:-

Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Daya Chaudhary, President Ms. Simarjot Kaur, Member

1) Whether Reporters of the Newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes/No

2) To be referred to the Reporters or not? Yes/No

3) Whether Judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No Present:-

For the Appellant : Mr. Shashank Bhandari, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Kartikeya Puri, Advocate JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY, PRESIDENT Appellant/opposite party (OP) i.e. Punjab Urban Planning and Development

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top