STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
1.The Commissioner Employees Provident Fund Organization – Appellant
Versus
1.G.Amrutha Reddy – Respondent
BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION:HYDERABAD (ADDITIONAL BENCH)
FA. No.102/2021 AGAINST ORDERS IN CC. No.51/2013 ON THE FILE OF DISTRICT FORUM, NIZAMABAD Between :-
1.The Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organization., “Bhavishyanidhi Bhavan’’
Regional Office, # 3-4-763, Barkatpura, Hyderabad- 500 027.
2.The Assistant Commissioner, Employees, Provident Fund Organization.
Regional Office, Nyalkal Road, Nizamabad – 503 001.
…..Appellants/Opposite parties.1 & 2.
And
1)G. Amrutha Reddy S/o. Ganga Reddy, Aged about 60 yrs R/o. Qrarter No.63, MIG-II, New NGO’s Colony, Kanteshwar, Nizamabad.
…Respondent /Complainant.
2)The Account Officers, FPS, APSRTC, Bus Bhuvan, Musheerabad.
Hyderabad.
3) The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Depot-II, Nizamabad.
…Respondents/opposite parties 3 & 4.
Counsel for the Appellants : M/s. K.Raghu Ram Reddy Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : Sri. A. Srinivas Reddy Counsel for the Respondent No.2 and 3 : Sri. Gaurav Kwatra.
QUORUM: Hon’ble Sri K.Ranga Rao - Presiding Officer-
Member- (Judicial).
&
Hon’ble Sri V.V.SESHUBABU- Member ( Judicial).
WEDNESDAY, THE 11th DAY OF MARCH, TWO THOUSAND TWENTY SIX *****
Order : (Per Hon’ble Sri K.Ranga Rao- Presiding O
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.