STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
SOU AMITA VIJAY PATIL – Appellant
Versus
NAMDEV VITHAL SURAWANSHI – Respondent
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI REVISION PETITION NO.RP/2024/44 (Arising out of the order dated 04/04/2024 passed by the Ld.District Consumer Commission Sangli in consumer complaint no.CC/24/27)
Sou.Asmita Vijay Patil R/o.Vijay Arcade, Opp.Market Yard Near Bapat Mala, Sangli Taluka Miraj, District Sangli ....... Revision Petitioner / Org.OP Versus Mr.Namadev Vitthal Suryawanshi ………Respondent/org.complainant R/o.Near Sangli Sakhar Karkhana Bhavan Madhavnagar Road, Sangli BEFORE: Justice S.P.Tavade – President Vijay C.Premchandani – Member PRESENT: Adv Madhav Tamhankar for the revision petitioner.
Adv Rajeev Lale for respondent.
ORAL ORDER (Dt.16/03/2026)
Per Hon’ble Vijay C.Premchandani – Member
1. The present revision petition is filed by the revision petitioner against the impugned order passed by the Ld. District Consumer Commission, Sangli as on 04/04/2024, in consumer complaint no.CC/24/27, below Exhibit-1, whereby the order was passed against present revision petitioner /original opponent that in spite of service of notice and appearance, failed to file written statement within time. Therefore, the matter was proceeded without written statement of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.