SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 2460

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
VINCENT D'SOUZA – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:IN PERSON ,Respondent Advocate:

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI APPEAL No.A/19/1167 (Arising out of order dated 09/10/2019 in CC/19/115 passed by District Commission, Central Mumbai)

Mr.Vincent D’Souza Pearl Colony, A/5, 1st floor ...Appellant/org.complainant Dr.Ambedkar Road Dadar (E), Mumbai 400 014 Versus Central Bank of India Naigaum, Dadar (East) ………Respondent/org.OP Mumbai 400 014 BEFORE: Justice S.P.Tavade – President Vijay C.Premchandani – Member Appellant in person PRESENT:

Adv J.K.Jadhav for respondent/Central Bank of India FINAL ORDER (Dt.20/03/2026)

Per Hon’ble Justice S.P.Tavade – President

1. The appellant/original complainant has filed this appeal challenging the impugned order dated 09/10/2019 passed by the Ld.District Consumer Commission, Central Mumbai in consumer complaint no.CC/19/115. It is contended in the appeal memo that the Ld.District Consumer Commission has not given fair opportunity to lead the evidence and disposed of the consumer complaint without considering the documentary evidence on record.

2. The appeal was admitted and the notice was issued to the respondent. Learned advocate for the respondent appeared and written submissions were filed.

3. Heard ap

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top