SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 2530

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
1. LIC of India – Appellant
Versus
Pawan Garg – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:M/s. Karra Srinivas ,Respondent Advocate:

BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION:HYDERABAD (ADDITIONAL BENCH)

FA. No. 243/2021 AGAINST ORDERS IN CC. No.114/2019 ON THE FILE OF DISTRICT FORUM-II, HYDERABAD Between :

1. The Life Insurance Corporation of India, Rep. by its Senior Divisional Manager, Divisional unit, Jeevan Prakash, Secretariat Road, Hyderabad-500 063, through its authorized signatory KVSSR Krishna Kumar S/o Late Veereswara Sastry, Age:57 years, Occ:-Asst. Secretary, LIC of India, L & HPF Department, SCZO, Hyderabad.

2. The Life Insurance Corporation of India, Rep by its Branch Manager, City Branch-5, Branch Code No.650, Jeevan Jyothi Building, 3rd Floor, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad through its authorized signatory KVSSR Krishna Kumar s/o. Late Veerswara Sastry, Age:- 57 years, Occ:- Asst. Secretary, LIC of India, L & HPF Department, SCZO, Hyderabad.

.….Appellants/opposite parties And

1. Pawan Garg s/o Madan Gopal, Age:57 years, Occ:- Business, R/o. H.No.8-2-120/110/1/2, Road No.14, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad-500 034.

……….Respondent /Complainant Counsel for the Appellants : M/s. K. Venkatesh Gupta Counsel for the Respondent : M/s. M. Raj Kumar QUOR UM: HON’BLE SMT MEENA RAMANATHAN, MEMBER – (NJ)

&

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top