IN THE DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
C. NO.201/2022 D.O.D.: 15.04.2026
COMPLAINT CASE NO.- 201/2022
1. MS. PRIYANKA KAPOOR,
2. MR. ASHWANI KAPOOR,
BOTH R/O 3102, IMPERIALCOURT III, JP WISH, SECTOR 128, NOIDA U.P.
(Through: Mahanjan & Co.)
…Complainants
VERSUS
M/S PARSVNATH HESSA DEVELOPERS LTD.,
CORPORATE OFFICE AT:
PARSVNATH TOWER, NEAR SHAHDARA METRO STATION, SHAHDARA, DELHI – 110032
THROUGH ITS MD/CHAIRMAN SANJEEV JAIN.
REGISTERED OFFICE AT:
6TH FLOOR, ARUNACHAL BUILDING, 19, BARAKHAMBA ROAD,
NEW DELHI – 110001.
(Through: KNM & Partners, Law Offices)
…Opposite Party
Present: Mr. Syed Yawar Ahmed and Mr. Sudhir Mahajan (on VC), counsel for the Complainant Enrl no. D/595/02.
Mr. T.P. Chauhan and Ms. Shambhavi Singh, counsel for OP.
CORAM:
HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL (PRESIDENT)
HON’BLE MS. BIMLA KUMARI, MEMBER (FEMALE)
Date of Institution: 23.11.2022
Date of hearing: 02.02.2026
Date of Decision: 15.04.2026
PER: HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL (PRESIDENT)
JUDGMENT
1. The present complaint has been filed by the Complainants before this commission alleging deficiency of service and unfair trade practice on the part of Opposite Party and has prayed the following reliefs:
i. Provide occupancy certificate in respect of flat No. 501, Tower B-6, in Parsvnath Exotica, Sector 53, Gurugram, Haryana to the Complainants;
ii. Execute sale deed/conveyance of the flat No. 501, Tower B-6, in Parsvnath Exotica, Sector 53, Gurugram, Haryana in favour of Complainants; and also;
iii. Pay delayed possession / compensation payable on the cost of funds of Rs. 1,52,33,250/- @ 6% p.a. for 11 years which comes to Rs. 1,20,79,000/-; or in the alternative pay the compensation of Rs. 51, 83, 612/- i.e. the benefit as per statement of account till May 20221 basis for the purchase of the said apartment by complainants
iv. To pay Rs. 10,00,000/- towards harassment and mental torture,
v. Cost of the complaint.
2. Brief facts necessary for the adjudication of the present complaint are that one Mr. Bhupinder Singh and Mrs. Harjeet Kaur booked Flat No. 501 in Tower B-6 in the project namely Parsvnath Exotica of the Opposite Party situated at Sector 54, Gurugram, Haryana. A Flat Buyer Agreement was executed between them on 22.02.2008. Moreover, the original owners opted for a down payment plan whereby they were required to pay 95% of the amount in advance and the remaining 5% was to be made at the time of possession. The aforesaid down payment was duly paid to the Opposite Party by the original owners by April, 2008. Thereafter, the Opposite Party failed to hand over possession of the said flat within the stipulated period as per the terms of the Agreement i.e., on and before 21.02.2011 including grace period. Subsequently, on 16.01.2021, the Opposite Party offered fit-out possession of the said flat to the original allottees along with certain benefits/discounts, including an amount of Rs.17,00,000/- on account of discount in the letter of fit-out possession, Rs.4,66,512/- towards discount on gross value of taxable services and a special rebate of Rs.30,17,100/- towards delay compensation for the period January, 2014 to May, 2021.
3. Thereafter, the present Complainants purchased the said flat from the original allottees with the consent of the Opposite Party and on the assurance that the aforesaid benefits would be transferred to them. Accordingly, the flat was endorsed in favour of the Complainants on 25.01.2022. However, despite such assurances, the Opposite Party failed to extend the said benefits and compensation to the Complainants. Moreover, the Opposite Party offered the possession of the said flat incomplete in all respects and without obtaining Occupation Certificate from the concerned authority. The Complainants, having invested a substantial amount, were constrained to take possession for interior work under duress on 01.02.2022. Also, the Opposite Party failed to execute the registry in favour of the Complainants till date. Despite repeated requests, the Opposite Party refused to pay the assured compensation, which led to the issuance of a legal notice dated 20.04.2022 by the Complainants but to no avail.
4. During the course of proceedings, notice was issued to the Opposite Party on 30.11.2022. It is evident from the order dated 10.07.2023 that the said notice was duly served upon the Opposite Party on 10.01.2023. However, the Opposite Party failed to file its written statement within the stipulated period. Consequently, this commission vide order dated 10.07.2023, closed the right of the Opposite Party to file the written statement. Since the right of the Opposite Party stood closed, the averments made by the Complainants in the present complaint remain unrebutted.
5. The Complainants have filed their evidence by way of affidavit in order to prove the averments made on record
6. The Complainants h
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.