STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI APPEAL NO.A/22/550 (Arising out of the order dated 21/09/2021 passed by the Ld.District Consumer Commission Raigad in consumer complaint no.CC/18/218)

Mr.Vinayak Shripat Jagde R/o.Flat no.B-301, Shree Shantiniketan …..Appellant/ Org.

‘C’ CHS Ltd. Plot no.12A, Sector 8 complainant Kharghar, Navi Mumbai 410 210 Versus Mr.Mahendra Babu Padvekar ……Respondent/org.OP At Post Bharne, Taluka Khed District Ratnagiri BEFORE: Justice S.P.Tavade – President Vijay C.Premchandani – Member Adv Rajkumar Jagtap for appellant.

PRESENT:

None present for respondent FINAL ORDER (Dt.15/04/2026)

Per Hon’ble Member Mr.Vijay C.Premchandani

1. The present appeal is preferred by the original complainant u/sec.41 of the Consumer Protection Act 2019, against the order dated 21/09/2021 passed by the Ld.District Consumer Commission, Raigad at Alibag in consumer complaint no.CC/21/218.

FACTUAL MATRIX :-

2. The appellant has contended in the appeal memo that he had given contract of construction of his house to the respondent for the total consideration of Rs.10 lakhs. It was decided between the appellant and the respondent that the respondent will constru