STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
1.The Supdt of Engineer TSSPDCL – Appellant
Versus
Pilltla Madhu alias Malsoor – Respondent
BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION: HYDERABAD.
F.A. No.462/2020 AGAINST ORDERS IN CC.No.01/2018 ON THE FILE OF DISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSION, NALGONDA Between:
1. Superintending Engineer, Operation Circle, TSSPDCL, Nalgonda.
2. Divisional Engineer/Operation, TSSPDCL, Huzurnager Village and Mandal, Suryapet District.
3. Asst. Engineer/Operation, TSSPDCL, Chilkur Village and Mandal, Suryapet District.
….Appellants/Opposite Parties And Mr. Pilltla Madhu @ Malsoor, S/o. Saidulu, Aged about: 50 years, Occ: Business, R/o. Huzurnagar Village and Mandal, Suryapet District.
…Respondent/Complainant Counsel for the Appellants/Opposite Parties : Mr. P. Gnaneshwar Rao Counsel for the Respondent/Complainant : V. Aparna & Associates QUORUM: HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE Dr.G.RADHA RANI, PRESIDENT &
HON’BLE SRI V.V.SESHUBABU, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND TWENTY SIX ORDER: (PER SRI V.V.SESHUBABU, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
1. The appeal is filed by the Opposite Parties U/s.15 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986, aggrieved by the order dated 23.01.2020 in CC No.01/2018 by the District Consumer Forum, Nalgonda, where under the complaint was allowed directing
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.