Back
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Padma Pandey, Presiding Member, Rajesh Kumar Arya, Member
Joshi Auto Zone Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Harsh Goyal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of facts leading to the consumer complaint and the initial order. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. analysis of evidentiary arguments regarding the accident date and registration status. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. legal obligation of dealers to ensure temporary registration before vehicle delivery. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
ORDER
| Appeal No. | : | 286 of 2024 |
| Date of Institution | : | 08.08.2024 |
| Date of Decision | : | 20.04.2026 |
Appeal against the order dated 28.03.2024 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-I, U.T. Chandigarh in Consumer Complaint No.611/2021.
PER PADMA PANDEY, PRESIDING MEMBER
This appeal is directed against the order dated 28.03.2024, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-I, U.T. Chandigarh (hereinafter to be referred as “the Ld. District Commission”), whereby consumer complaint (CC/611/2021) filed by the complainant/respondent No.1 was partly allowed as under;
“In view of the above discussion, the present consumer complaint succeeds and the same is accordingly partly allowed. OP No.3 to 7 & 10 are directed as under :-
i. To refund amount of Rs.2,45,987/- to the complainant alongwith intere
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
