STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
CANARA BANK Through its person in charge – Appellant
Versus
JAGIR SINGH S/o. amar singh – Respondent
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION PUNJAB, DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR 37-A, CHANDIGARH Date of Institution : 19.12.2025 Reserved on : 27.03.2026 Date of Decision : 20.04.2026 Canara Bank through its Chairman/Managing Director/Person Incharge/Branch Manager, Main Road, Near Honda Agency, Majitha-
143601, District Amritsar.
…..Petitioner/Opposite Party Versus
1. Jagir Singh age about 72 years S/o Amar Singh, R/o VPO Nag Khurd, Amritsar.
2. Simranjit Kaur W/o Sarwan Singh, R/o VPO Nag Khurd, Amritsar.
…..Respondents/Complainants Revision Petition under Section 47 (1)(B) of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 for setting aside the exparte order dated 10.11.2025 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Amritsar.
Quorum:-
Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Daya Chaudhary, President Ms. Simarjot Kaur, Member Mr. Vishav Kant Garg, Member Present:-
For the Petitioner : Sh. Nitin Gupta, Advocate For the Respondents : Sh. Kartikeya Puri, Advocate for Sh. Sukhandeep Singh, Advocate
1) Whether Reporters of the Newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes/No
2) To be referred to the Reporters or not? Yes/No
3) Whether judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY, PRE
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.