SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 3043

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
CANARA BANK Through its person in charge – Appellant
Versus
JAGIR SINGH S/o. amar singh – Respondent


STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION PUNJAB, DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR 37-A, CHANDIGARH Date of Institution : 19.12.2025 Reserved on : 27.03.2026 Date of Decision : 20.04.2026 Canara Bank through its Chairman/Managing Director/Person Incharge/Branch Manager, Main Road, Near Honda Agency, Majitha-

143601, District Amritsar.

…..Petitioner/Opposite Party Versus

1. Jagir Singh age about 72 years S/o Amar Singh, R/o VPO Nag Khurd, Amritsar.

2. Simranjit Kaur W/o Sarwan Singh, R/o VPO Nag Khurd, Amritsar.

…..Respondents/Complainants Revision Petition under Section 47 (1)(B) of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 for setting aside the exparte order dated 10.11.2025 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Amritsar.

Quorum:-

Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Daya Chaudhary, President Ms. Simarjot Kaur, Member Mr. Vishav Kant Garg, Member Present:-

For the Petitioner : Sh. Nitin Gupta, Advocate For the Respondents : Sh. Kartikeya Puri, Advocate for Sh. Sukhandeep Singh, Advocate

1) Whether Reporters of the Newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes/No

2) To be referred to the Reporters or not? Yes/No

3) Whether judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY, PRE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top