SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 3164

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
HDFC Bank Ltd. & Anr. – Appellant
Versus
Gurcharanjit Singh & Ors. – Respondent
SC/3/A/1116/2022



Petitioner Advocates:S.C. Thatai ,Respondent Advocate:

ADDITIONAL BENCH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR 37-A, CHANDIGARH.

Date of Institution: 20.12.2022 Reserved on : 27.03.2026 Decided on : 17.04.2026

1) HDFC Bank Ltd., Branch Chumari Tehsil Ajnala District Amritsar through its Branch Manager Sh. Rohit Soni.

2) Managing Director, HDFC Bank Ltd. having its office at HDFC Bank House, Senapati Bapat Marh, Lower Parel (W) Mumbai-

400013 through Sh. Rohit Soni..

.….Appellants/opposite parties No.1&2 Versus

1. Gurcharanjit Singh S/o Sh. Boota Singh aged 50 years, resident of village Awan, Near Ramdass, Tehsil Ajnala District Amritsar 9781140003.

….Respondent No.1/complainant

2. Parminder Singh the then Branch Manager, HDFC Bank Ltd.

through its Branch Manager, Branch Chumari, Tehsil Ajnala, District Amritsar (since deceased)

3. Mandeep Singh the then Cashier, HDFC Bank Ltd., through its Branch Manager, Branch Chumari, Tehsil Ajnala, District Amritsar.

4. Harpreet Singh the then PB Sales, HDFC Bank Ltd., through its Branch Manager, Branch Chumari, Tehsil Ajnala District Amritsar.

5. Narinder Singh S/o Sh. Pritam tea Seller, near HDFC Bank Ltd. Branch Chumari, Tehsil Ajnala District Amritsar.

.....Respondents No.2 to 5/Opposite parties No.3 to 6 Date of Institution: 20.12.2022 Reserved on : 27.03.2026 Decided on :

1) HDFC Bank Ltd., Branch Chumari Tehsil Ajnala District Amritsar through its Branch Manager Sh. Rohit Soni.

2) Managing Director, HDFC Bank Ltd. having its office at HDFC Bank House, Senapati Bapat Marh, Lower Parel (W) Mumbai-

400013 through Sh. Rohit Soni..

.….Appellants/opposite parties No.1&2 Versus

1. Jinder Masih S/o Sh.Munshi Masih aged 62 years resident of village Awan, Near Ramdass, Tehsil Ajnala, District Amritsar

9815165773.

….Respondent No.1/complainant

2. Parminder Singh the then Branch Manager, HDFC Bank Ltd.

through its Branch Manager, Branch Chumari, Tehsil Ajnala, District Amritsar (since deceased)

3. Mandeep Singh the then Cashier, HDFC Bank Ltd., through its Branch Manager, Branch Chumari, Tehsil Ajnala, District Amritsar.

4. Harpreet Singh the then PB Sales, HDFC Bank Ltd., through its Branch Manager, Branch Chumari, Tehsil Ajnala District Amritsar.

5. Lovepreet Singh, Tea Seller, near HDFC Bank Ltd. Branch Chumari, Tehsil Ajnala District Amritsar.

.....Respondents No.2 to 5/Opposite parties No.3 to 6 First Appeals under Section 41 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 against similar orders dated 28.06.2022 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Amritsar in CC/167/2016 &

CC/168/2016 Quorum:-

Mr. H.P.S. Mahal, Presiding Judicial Member Ms. Kiran Sibal, Member Present:- (in both the appeals)

For the appellants : Ms. Monika Thatai, Advocate For respondent No.1 : Ms. Kavita Arora, Advocate For respondents No.2 to 4: Deleted vide order dt.10.02.2023 For respondent No.5 : Ex-parte KIRAN SIBAL, MEMBER:-

This order shall dispose of the above noted two (2) First Appeals preferred against the similar orders dated 28.06.2022 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Amritsar (in short, “the District Commission”), as the questions of law and facts involved therein are similar. Both the appeals have been filed by the appellants/OPs No.1 & 2 for setting aside the impugned order of the District Commission. Facts are taken from First Appeal No.1116 of 2022 titled as “HDFC Bank Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Gurcharanjit Singh & Ors”. The complaint filed by respondent/complainant- Gurcharanjit Singh, before the District Commission i.e. CC/167/2016, was allowed as under:-

“9. In view of the above discussion, we allow the complaint with costs and opposite party No.1 is directed to refund Rs.1.20 lacs and Rs.4.90 lacs alongwith interest @10% p.a. from the date of filing of complaint till its realization. As the complainant has faced harassment as well mentally agony, as such complainant is entitled to compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- and litigation expenses of Rs.50,000/- to the complainant and OP No.1 is at liberty to recover the awarded amount

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top