SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 3292

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
CORPORATION BANK AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
SEETA DEVI – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:TRIBHAWAN SINGLA ,Respondent Advocate:

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA FIRST APPEAL NO. SC/6/A/26/2020 CORPORATION BANK AND ANOTHER PRESENT ADDRESS - NEAR NEELAM CHOWK, RAILWAY ROAD, NH-5, FARIDABAD,HARYANA.

.......Appellant(s)

Versus SEETA DEVI PRESENT ADDRESS - H.NO. 1017, AZAD NAGAR, SECTOR 24, NIT FARIDABAD. ,HARYANA.

.......Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

MR. S . P . SOOD , JUDICIAL MEMBER MR. SURESH CHANDER KAUSHIK , MEMBER FOR THE APPELLANT:

NONE FOR THE APPELLANTS.

FOR THE RESPONDENT:

MR. NEETISH HANDA, LEGAL AID COUNSEL FOR THE LEGAL HEIRS OF RESPONDENT.

DATED: 23/04/2026

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA Date of Institution: 10.01.2020 Date of final hearing: 23.04.2026 Date of order: 23.04.2026 First Appeal No.26 of 2020 IN THE MATTER OF:-

1. Corporation Bank, Near Neelam Chowk, Railway Road, NH-5, Faridabad, District Faridabad through its Manager.

2. Corporation Bank, Corporate office, Mangal Devi Temple Road, Pandeshwar, Mangalore (Karnataka).

.....Appellants Versus Seeta Devi (now deceased) wife of Sh. Shankar Shah through her following LRs:-

i. Naresh Chand, Son ii. Dinesh Chand Son iii. Prabhat Son iv. Prakash Son All residents of House No.1017, Azad Nagar, Sector-24, NIT,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top