SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 3385

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
LEELA SOOD & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
ANR INFRASTRUCTURE INDIA – Respondent


IN THE DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION Date of Institution: 03.05.2013 Date of hearing: 03.02.2026 Date of Decision: 11.05.2026 COMPLAINT CASE NO. 265/2013 IN THE MATTER OF

1. MRS. LEENA SOOD, W/O MR. VINOD KUMAR, 2. MR. VINOD KUMAR, S/O LATE MR. C.L. SOOD, BOTH R/O:

R/O: B-98, HARI NAAGAR, NEW DELHI-64.

(Through: Mr. Varun Kathuria, Advocate)

...Complainants VERSUS ARN INFRASTRUCTURES INDIA PVT. LTD., THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN/MANAGING DIRECTOR, 9, BIRLA HOUSE, ARYA SAMAJ ROAD, KAROL BAGH, NEW DELHI-110005.

(Through: Mr. Vivek Singh & Ms. Eesha Shonak, Advocate)

...Opposite Party CORAM:

HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, PRESIDENT HON’BLE MS. BIMLA KUMARI, MEMBER (FEMALE)

Present: None for the Complainant.

Ms. Eesha Shonak, Counsel for the OP appeared through VC.

PER: HON’BLE JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, (PRESIDENT)

JUDGMENT

1. The present complaint has been filed by the Complainants before this Commission alleging deficiency of service on the part of Opposite Party and have prayed the following reliefs:

“a) direct the Respondent/Opposite Party to handover vacant and peaceful possession of the site, complete in all respects to the Complainants;

OR IN ALTERNATIVE a) dire

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top