SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 3467

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MPMKVVCO.LTD. – Appellant
Versus
SHARIF – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MS.SAPNA AGGRAWAL ,Respondent Advocate:

M. P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PLOT NO.76, ARERA HILLS, BHOPAL FIRST APPEAL NO.906 OF 2019 (Arising out of order dated 04.04.2019 passed in Case.No.09/2016 by District Commission, Sheopur)

M.P.POORV KSHETRIYA VIDHYUT VITRAN COMPANY LIMITED, THROUGH EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, SHEOPUR. … APPELLANT.

Versus . SHARIF MOHD., R/O BALAPURA, SHEOPUR. .… RESPONDENT.

BEFORE :

HON’BLE JUSTICE SMT.SUNITA YADAV, PRESIDENT HON’BLE DR. (MRS) MONIKA MALIK, MEMBER COUNSEL FOR PARTIES :

Shri Rajeev Acharya, learned counsel for the appellant.

Shri Anil Chadokar, learned counsel for respondent.

O R D E R (Passed on .03.2026)

The following order of the Commission was delivered by Dr.(Mrs) Monika Malik, Member :

This is an appeal by the opposite party / appellant –

M.P.Poorv Kshetra Vidhyut Vitran Company Limited (hereinafter referred to as ‘Electricity Company’) directed against the order dated 04.04.2019 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Sheopur (for short ‘District Commission’) in complaint case no. 09/2016, whereby the District Commission has allowed the complaint and has directed to quash the bill dated 03.12.2015 demanding Rs.1,54,137/-. Electricity Company is furth

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top