Back
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, President, Bimla Kumari, Member
Rawal Acids Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural background and arguments regarding limitation and review applications. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. determination that limitation starts from the date of repudiation and cannot be extended by correspondence. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. final disposal of the appeal and administrative directions. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
JUDGMENT
1. The present Appeal has been filed by the Appellant against the impugned order dated 13.02.2024, passed by the District Commission-V in Review Application No. 04 of 2024 filed in Consumer Complaint No. 487/2023, whereby the District Commission has dismissed the Review Application in the following terms:
“1. An application filed by complainant u/s 40, of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 for seeking review of order dated 29.11.2023. It is stated by the applicant / complainant that for arriving the conclusion that the complaint is barred by limitation, this Commission has erroneously took into consideration a fact that the cause of action for filing the complaint arose on 02.12.2020 and thereafter the final cause of action for filing the same arose vide repudiation dated 19.07.2021. This is error apparent on the face
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
