STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
N K TRADERS Through its ProP. NAGENDRA shaw – Appellant
Versus
SUMAN DAS S/o. Swapan das – Respondent
SC/19/RP/110/2025
##PAGE1##
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
WEST BENGAL
REVISION PETITION NO. SC/19/RP/110/2025
(Against the Order dated 17th October 2025 in Appeal No. DC/303/CC/2051/2025 of the District
Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission North 24 parganas)
WITH
SC/19/IA/1050/2025 (STAY)
N K TRADERS Through its ProP. NAGENDRA shaw
BUSINESS ADDRESS - CN 8/2, SIDCO GLOBAL TOWER, 8TH FLOOR, ROOM NO.804SALT
LAKE, SECTOR V , 24 PARAGANAS NORTH,WEST BENGAL.
NAGENDRA SHAW S/o. Ramji prasad shaw
PERMANENT ADDRESS - SHIBALAYA , LOKENATH MANDIR, RAJARHAT GOPALPUR M ,
PURBACHAL, , 24 PARAGANAS NORTH,WEST BENGAL.
.......Petitioner(s)
Versus
SUMAN DAS S/o. Swapan das
PERMANENT ADDRESS - BAMIHATI, HABRA , 24 PARAGANAS NORTH,WEST BENGAL.
.......Respondent(s)
BEFORE:
HON'BLE MRS. SOMA BHATTACHARJEE , PRESIDING MEMBER
HON'BLE MR. ANANDA KUMAR TIWARI , JUDICIAL MEMBER
FOR THE PETITIONER:
ANWESHA MISHRA (Advocate)
DATED: 25/05/2026
ORDER
HON’BLE ANANDA KUMAR TIWARI
(JUDICIAL MEMBER)
Final Order/Judgement
Date of Filing Date of hearing Date of Judgment
23/12/2025 25/05/2026 25/05/2026
##PAGE2##The revisionist N.K. Traders through its Proprietor Nagendra Shaw filed this Revision Petition under
Section 47(1)(b) of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 ( hereinafter referred to as the Act of 2019) to impeach
the order No 5 dated 17/10/25 passed by Ld. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, North 24
Pgs at Barasat (hereinafter referred to as the DCDRC) whereby Hon’ble District Commission observing that
statutory period is over, did not accept written version filed by the OP No 1 and 2.
Going through the materials it reveals that respondent herein being Suman Das filed one petition of
complaint being CC/2051/2025 before Hon’ble District Commission praying for an order directing the
revisionist to refund Rs. 5,00,000/- along with interest as well as for compensation and litigation cost as
stated in said complaint. It is further case of the revisionist that after receiving the summon on 22.07.2025,
the revisionist appeared before Hon’ble District Commission on 03.09.2025 with W.V. stating the ground
but unfortunately the date being declared holiday, the revisionist failed to file the W.V on that day. It is
further stated that the date was fixed on 04.09.2025, which was not known to the revisionist and on
04/09/25; next date was fixed on 17.10.2025 and on that day Ld. Advocate for the revisionist appeared
before Hon’ble DCDRC and filed the W.V. but the same was not accepted. It is stated that Hon’ble DCDRC
without giving due consideration to the facts, refused to accept the W.V. as the statutory period was over.
Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the said order dt. 17.10.2025 passed by Hon’ble DCDRC in
CC/2051/2025, the revisionist filed the revision on the ground that the impugned order dt. 17.10.2025 is
contrary to the law and Hon’ble Commission passed the order without going through the situation and on
further ground that Hon’ble DCDRC erred in not using the judicial observation that the revisionist had to be
intimated about the next date. Contending the above and other facts as mentioned in the application the
revisionist prayed to allow the revision and set aside the order dt. 17.10.2025 passed by Hon’ble DCDRC in
CC/2051/2025.
The record reflects that on last two days none appeared on behalf of the revisionist and on
06.04.2026, Ld. Advocate for the respondent filed Vakalatnama and as none appeared on behalf of the
revisionist on that day as well as on 12/05/26 and again on 25/05/26, the revisionist was directed to show
cause as to why the matter be not disposed of on merit. Today Ld Advocate for the revisionist appeared and
filed show cause stating that due to illness she could not appear on last dates. Though Ld Advocate for the
revisionist failed to appear on last two dates, for ends of justice the show cause is accepted. The revision
application is taken up for hearing. Hd Ld Advocate for the revisionist as well as Ld Advocate for the
respondent at length. It is submitted by the revisionist th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.