Back
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Bibhas Ranjan De, President, Mridula Roy, Member
Bengal Roy's Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Anindita Pathak Saha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural history and the necessity of hearing parties in compliance with natural justice. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. contention regarding necessity of local inspection in property hand-over disputes. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. judicial discretion for court-ordered investigation on disputed facts of property specifications. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. final directions limiting investigation scope and mandating timely case resolution. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
ORDER
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIBHAS RANJAN DE, PRESIDENT
1. This Revision Petition is directed against the impugned Order dt.22.07.2024, emanated from the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, North 24 Parganas (Barasat) (hereinafter referred to as Jurisdictional DCDRC), the operative portion whereof is reproduced herein below :
“Order No.18
Dated 22.07.2024
Today is fixed for hearing the M.A. Case No.167/2023 filed by the Complainant.
Ld. Advocate for the Complainant is present. Petition dated 05.09.2023 which registered as M.A. 167/2023 is taken up for hearing. Heard Ld. Advocate for the Complainant.
Ld. Advocate for the Complainant prayed for local investigation over the disputed property in respect of certa
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
