Back
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Kumkum Rani, President, C.M. Singh, Member
E-Homes Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Gagandeep Arora – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of case facts, initial complaint, and lower court proceedings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. summary of rival arguments concerning jurisdiction and existence of contracts. (Para 4 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. analysis of evidence proving lack of concluded contractual relationship. (Para 11 , 12 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. application of precedents on pecuniary jurisdiction and burden of proof. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. final reasoning and determination regarding the untenability of the lower court judgment. (Para 19 , 20) |
ORDER
(Per: Mr. C.M. Singh, Member):
This appeal has been directed against judgment and order dated 22.04.2019 passed by the learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Haridwar (hereinafter to be referred as the District Commission) in consumer complaint No. 401 of 2014 styled as Sh. Gagandeep Arora & Anr. Vs. Sh. Suneet Pratap Singh and Ors., wherein and whereby the complaint was allowed directing the opposite parties to execute the sale deed in favour of the complainants in respect of Flat Nos. 14 & 15 Sector 75A, Noida after receiving the entire consideration amount as per agreement as well as to pay Rs. 10,000/- towards compensation and litigation expenses to the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
